venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
Can anyone tell me what they consider to be the defining characteristic (if any) of a fish fork ?

Incidentally, I too can use google. I want to know what you, yourself, with your own mind think constitutes a fish fork.

Date: 2006-09-27 12:03 am (UTC)
taimatsu: (Default)
From: [personal profile] taimatsu
It's a small fork with three (not four) fairly broad tines.

(If only one is broad, it may be a dessert fork, though these usually have four tines.)

Date: 2006-09-27 10:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Wikipedia is with you on the three-tined thing. Sadly, I'm not. I maintain that three tines is into cake fork territory and fish forks should have four. Very few people seem to agree, though.

My current household has no fishforks (as far as I'm aware) and I can't say I've felt the lack. My parents house has four-tined fish forks, with a strange bobbly hole between the middle pair.

The bobbly hole has always been what I considered defining, but there's very little evidence that this is even widespread, never mind required. This (http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://www.questodesign.com/shop/images/kitchen/alessi/dry/dry_fish_knife_fork_m.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.questodesign.com/shop/proddetail.php%3Fprod%3Dalessi_4180%252F17&h=240&w=240&sz=7&hl=en&start=48&tbnid=kA88wt-eOFRIJM:&tbnh=104&tbnw=104&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522fish%2Bfork%2522%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-GB:official%26sa%3DN) is a rather exaggerated version of what I mean.

Date: 2006-09-27 04:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] al-fruitbat.livejournal.com
I can't remember where I read it, but I was informed fish knives are ludicrously middle-class, serving no useful function at all? I read that once, and felt angry for a while (there were fish forks in the house I grew up in) but the explanation does make sense.

You may need a seperate knife to eat fish - the knife should be straight, bendy and suitable for lifting and cutting as well as removing skin and bone.

You do not need a seperate fork, and unless you've got antique silver tableware where each set comes with a different motif, you've got no excuse for putting one on the table.

Date: 2006-09-27 07:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
I have read that silver cutlery can pick up the smell of fish, and therefore a separate set of forks was also deemed necessary. I don't know if this is true, though, and even before the advent of stainless steel I suspect it was more about snobbery than utility.

My perception

Date: 2006-09-27 06:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ringbark.livejournal.com
Fish cutlery is fancy and baroque, while meat cutlery is plainer.
(Often, ordinary cutlery is kept in the drawer, while fish cutlery is in a velvet box, only opened on rare occasions: when we (a) have fish to eat (b) remember and can be bothered to get the fish cutlery out)

Date: 2006-09-27 06:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
It generally has a wee waist in the 'bowl' part. Goodness knows why, maybe to trap bones. And it's usually smaller than a real fork.

(I was going to say that the leftmost tine was widened into a sort of blade, but actually I now think that is more of a dessert fork characteristic.)

Date: 2006-09-27 07:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
It generally has a wee waist in the 'bowl' part

Could you explain that again for the stupid ? I thought I'd understood, but the trapping bones part doesn't make much sense, so now I fear I haven't.

Date: 2006-09-27 08:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
By the bowl part I mean the flattish segment which has the handle at one end and the tines at the other. In a fish fork I think this usually has a notch on either side about halfway along. I speculated they might be for catching bones because on a sword you sometimes have similar notches for catching the opponent's sword, so it can't just slide smoothly along your edge -- so the fish fork notches might maybe prevent bones springing up the saide of the fork and hitting you in the eye. But this was mostly a facetious suggestion.

Date: 2006-09-27 10:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
But this was mostly a facetious suggestion.

I feel betrayed and let down :)

Date: 2006-09-27 08:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secondhand-rick.livejournal.com
I was going to say that the leftmost tine was widened into a sort of blade

A runcible spoon!

Date: 2006-09-27 08:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
Mm, no, that's more like a spork for me, ie. it's basically a spoon with tines cut into it. A dessert fork is a fork with one tine broadened, but it's not otherwise bowl-like.

But this could all be completely wrong. Hopefully [livejournal.com profile] venta will enlighten us as to fork taxonomy shortly.

Date: 2006-09-27 10:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Hopefully venta will enlighten us as to fork taxonomy shortly.

Sadly, no. Venta wants to know, and found the interweb rather unsatisfactory as a source, and that's why she's asking.

Date: 2006-09-27 10:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Nope.

In my parents house, there are some strange brown, translucent plastic spoons which I believe were actually Mothercare's best baby-feeding equipment at a time when I merited such things. They now, on account of their tolerance for EPNS-rotting vinegar, get used for pickles.

For as long as I can remember I have been firmly convinced that that is what was meant by a runcible spoon.

Date: 2006-09-27 11:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secondhand-rick.livejournal.com
Feel free to be as convince - and wrong - as you like.

While in defiance of its origins, a runcible spoon does in fact have three broad tines, one of which (an outside one, one presumes) has a slightly sharpened edge.

Date: 2006-09-28 07:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
We had a similar tradition: only it was a fluted silver spoon with an almost-circular bowl, whose origins were lost in the midst of time, that to us defined runcibility.

On which subject, what makes a runcible hat, as allegedly worn by Lear himself?

Date: 2006-09-27 08:02 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
Can be held using just fins.

Date: 2006-09-27 08:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Mental image is of a lightweight fork with longer and possibly fewer tines than a normal fork.

Date: 2006-09-27 08:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marjory.livejournal.com
Fish forks have 4 slender tines and a waist. They go together with fish knives which have fairly flat blades and a banana-curved aspect, which is meant to help get the skin and any bones separate from the fish. These knives tend to have fancy carvings on said blade. Mayhap the fork is just supposed to match the knife?

I s'pose if one is ever likely to serve up a full-course dinner, then it would be nice to have different cutlery for different courses...

Date: 2006-09-27 10:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Fish forks have 4 slender tines and a waist.

Thank goodness someone agrees with me. What is all this speaking of three tines and a broad bit - that's a cake fork!

Unless... you don't think Darlington has different fish forks to the rest of the world, do you ?

Regional Forking

Date: 2006-09-28 08:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marjory.livejournal.com
The only fish cutlery I've ever handled IRL belonged to my Grandma, and she was Scottish, so... Maybe we are looking at Darlo and Scotland having weird fish forkage...

PS

Date: 2006-09-27 10:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
For veritably hours of cutlery-related fun and astonishment, try here (http://www.replacements.com/piecetype/flat_piece.htm). The first page is relatively sensible, but it rapidly spirals into ludicrous and the descriptions are great.

Date: 2006-09-27 08:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cuthbertcross.livejournal.com
You get a mummy fish, and a daddy fish, and they love each other very much. Then the daddy fish gives the mummy fish a special hug....

Oh. Fork. Sorry. Forget I said anything...

Date: 2006-09-27 08:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secondhand-rick.livejournal.com
As far as I know, the key thing about a fish fork is that it matches a fish knife.

As [livejournal.com profile] al_fruitbat suggests, the fish knife is indeed one of the middle-classiest things you can get. You see, a fish knife is blunt, because you're not supposed to cut fish; if it's properly cooked, it will come apart naturally in flakes, something that of course the gentry have always known. But when the poor, old, nouveaux riche started going to restaurants when such things were new, they didn't. So fish knives were introduced to stop them upsetting the sensibilities of the proper customers with their zany fish-cutting antics.

With regards any of the other specific properties of the fish fork, dunno. They're often broader tined than regular stabbin' forks, and often (but not always) have three tines (maybe both of these things are simply to help it match the broad-bladed knife). Oh, and they often have an indentation in the... erm... the bit immediately behind the tines, and before the handle.

Date: 2006-09-27 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Hmm. Y'see, as I understand it the broad-tine thingy on a cake fork is so it can be used in a slightly knife-like way to cut off bits of cake. So, if fish should not be cut, why would the fork have a broad tine ?

I grew up with four-tined fishforks, and am confused at this co-option of things I consider to be cakeforks for piscean purposes.

Date: 2006-09-27 11:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secondhand-rick.livejournal.com
I think it's because, as I suggested on my opening comments to the floor, the only key quality of a fish fork is that it match the fish knife.

So various bods have designed them in various ways, some of which resemble cake forks in an effort to make them not look like normal forks.

Date: 2006-09-27 09:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
Funny shape. Thin edge, for going in edgeways.

Oh, hang on, that's a fish-slice. A friend of mine was basically incapable of saying "get a word in edgeways" without following it with "like a fish-slice".

Fish-forks are more for phrases like "bugger me sideways with a fish-fork", suggesting that they don't go in easily edgeways, though frankly I think any cutlery would be poorly suited to that sort of usage.

Owen and I were talking just the other day about incredibly specific kitchen-implements: melon-ballers, egg-slicers, teabag-squeezers, pastry-brushes, that kind of thing. When I helped to count my College's silver (!) I discovered that they had more than one pair of asparagus-tongs. I had to completely recalibrate my ideas of poshness!

Date: 2006-09-27 10:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.com
Well presumably if it's a college they give asparagus to a lot of people at once, and if one person's doing all the tongings it'd take all day.

Date: 2006-09-27 10:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
A friend of mine was basically incapable of saying "get a word in edgeways" without following it with "like a fish-slice".

That just shows how terribly well-educated your friend is. I too say that. In fact, in my family the way to get people to be quiet if you have something important to say and can't get a word in is to shout "fishslice".

What are asparagus tongs, anyway ? How do they differ from other tongs ? Even this website (http://www.replacements.com/piecetype/flat_piece.htm), which provides ten pages of increasingly bizarre specialist cutlery doesn't mention them.

Date: 2006-09-28 07:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
What a great site! "Cream soup spoons are smaller than a gumbo spoon and larger than a bouillon spoon. Generally, these spoons have round shallow bowls." And that's just on the first page.

Date: 2006-09-27 09:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beckyc.livejournal.com
A fish fork (and knife?) are shaped such that they are of no earthly use to anyone wanting to use them for anything else.

When an elderly relative of mine died a few years ago, my aunt, when selecting something from the estate for each of us as a keepsake saw fit to give me (then the only vegetarian in the family, although now there are more) a set of silver fish cutlery. I have never used them, and I presume they are somewhere in my parents' house.

Date: 2006-09-27 10:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ar-gemlad.livejournal.com
The side prong is wide and has a notch in it. Or is that a dessert fork? Can you have fish for dessert?

Date: 2006-09-27 10:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
I think that's a dessert fork. Most other people don't seem to.

Unlike fish forks, cake forks are great. Mostly because if someone gives you a cake fork, it usually means they're about to give you a cake too gooey to be eaten with fingers alone. So they are harbingers of happy cakey times, and thus a Good Thing.

Date: 2006-09-27 10:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.com
It's wooden and comes out of a box patterned with fake newspaper print.

Date: 2006-09-27 10:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.com
I ought to point out I posted this and *then* I read the comments.

Date: 2006-09-27 10:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
This wasn't what I meant, but it's a perfectly reasonable answer. I suspect I've probably eaten fish with one of those wooden two-pronged affairs rather more often than with an official silver fish fork.

Date: 2006-09-27 11:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] floralaetifica.livejournal.com
It's ability to snap at a moment's notice.

Oh, you mean... Hm, had never thought about the possibility of fish forks, only knives. Hence my immediate assumption that you were talking about the wooden/plastic chip shop variety.

Date: 2006-09-27 12:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dr-bob.livejournal.com
It's like a fork (table cutlery) only one of the tines on the edge is broader.

Date: 2006-09-27 12:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marjory.livejournal.com
Okay, okay, I give up!

Why do you want to know this?

Date: 2006-09-27 10:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Same as ever. Idle curiosity.

Date: 2006-09-28 08:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marjory.livejournal.com
Fairy nuff.

But why, really?! ;p

Date: 2006-09-27 04:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lathany.livejournal.com
I want to know what you, yourself, with your own mind think constitutes a fish fork.

It is the bringer of dark suspicions about what the starter might be.

Date: 2006-09-27 10:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Dark suspicions ? Surely you mean 'happy anticipations' ?

Date: 2006-09-27 06:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] narenek.livejournal.com
Made of silver or at the very least silver plated and quite delicate.

IIRC boring old steel (not stainless steel) would react badly with somethingorother in the fish and go black and make the fish taste bad, so you made them out of silver so they wouldn't react.

Partly because of this fish forks also tend to be small and delicate (fish generally not needing highly robust cutlery and silver being expensive).

Date: 2006-09-27 10:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
[livejournal.com profile] ach maintained today that it's the lemon juice you put on fish that was the problem.

The silver being pricier than steel/pewter/etc causing the forks to be smaller isn't something that'd occurred to me, but it's a good thought.

Date: 2006-09-27 07:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cardinalsin.livejournal.com
One of them short two-pronged wooden thingies. No wait, that's a chip-fork. Pass.

Date: 2006-09-27 10:54 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"Phone for the fish knives, Norman..." Fish forks are four-tined, slightly more elaborate than the other forks in the canteen of cutlery, and with matching knives with a flat, wide and generally fancy-shaped blade with a pattern and you own them because, if you are late middle-aged like me, you had a canteen of cutlery, 80 or so pieces including butterknife and jam spoon, in a mahogany case when you got married.

Date: 2006-09-29 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hi Liz!

I was sufficiently moved by this very profound discussion to create my conception of a fish fork for you. However, you will need to visit my blog to view this cutleric item, since I can post a comment to your brainchild, but, sadly, not an image.

Now, better get on with some proper illustration ...

Cathy xxx

Date: 2006-10-03 04:38 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Fish forks and knives are used for fish as it can be tasted (by some - so I'm told) on the cutlery afterwards even once washed.

I use the same cutlery for everything myself ... but the abve is what I've been told ... ;)

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 04:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios