A while ago I was grumbling about a black and white film which jammed my camera up. Having now got it developed, it turns out that it was rather worse than I thought, and the film actually never wound on properly at all. So each "frame" of the film contains sections of three or four intended photos.
Boots have developed the sections of film which weren't hopelessly overexposed, unexposed, or otherwise mangled, and chopped them up into fairly arbitrary frames. These are mostly useless, confused images of boats and trains and beaches.
However, one or two came out quite interesting. So, courtesy of an elderly SLR, a non-winding film, Boots,
broadmeadow and his negative scanner, and a bit of imagination, I present:
The April '04 Alternative Camgoth Photo
With optional Covgoth t-shirt in the background :)
Boots have developed the sections of film which weren't hopelessly overexposed, unexposed, or otherwise mangled, and chopped them up into fairly arbitrary frames. These are mostly useless, confused images of boats and trains and beaches.
However, one or two came out quite interesting. So, courtesy of an elderly SLR, a non-winding film, Boots,
The April '04 Alternative Camgoth Photo
With optional Covgoth t-shirt in the background :)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-15 07:22 am (UTC)Does anything of yours work properly?
no subject
Date: 2004-06-15 07:25 am (UTC)My pokey-in-the-eye finger works fine.
*poke*
And anyway, I refuse to be responsible for breaking the internet. I wasn't anywhere near it at the time!
no subject
Date: 2004-06-15 08:08 am (UTC)*sigh*
no subject
Date: 2004-06-15 08:09 am (UTC)Hopefully the new Discman is still young enough to be Taken Back and Grumbled About ?
no subject
Date: 2004-06-15 08:19 am (UTC)Suspect buying one from somewhere I CAN get my money back when this happens next time is probably a cunning plan even if it does cost me more money.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-15 08:24 am (UTC)I've forgotten what was the problem with the old one. Is it something which might plausibly be caused by an aspect of your treatment of it ? Or just bad CD karma ?
no subject
Date: 2004-06-15 08:26 am (UTC)At the risk of sounding patronising, you're sure it is the Discman itself, and not your headphones that's faulty ? Sounds like it might be loose connections in the headphone wires - and they're cheaper to replace than the whole thing!
no subject
Date: 2004-06-15 09:14 am (UTC)But no I tried that and it isn't.
*sigh*
You know anyone who wants two broken discmen?
no subject
Date: 2004-06-15 09:34 am (UTC)Someone with a deranged creative side, and a strange taste in earrings ?
no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 03:16 am (UTC)Not if the whole thing is five quid from eBay, they're not.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 03:39 am (UTC)Do I mean predicated ? It sounds wrong.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 03:48 am (UTC)Ah, I see. Sorry.
I think you do mean predicated.