![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ventaA while ago I was grumbling about a black and white film which jammed my camera up. Having now got it developed, it turns out that it was rather worse than I thought, and the film actually never wound on properly at all. So each "frame" of the film contains sections of three or four intended photos.
Boots have developed the sections of film which weren't hopelessly overexposed, unexposed, or otherwise mangled, and chopped them up into fairly arbitrary frames. These are mostly useless, confused images of boats and trains and beaches.
However, one or two came out quite interesting. So, courtesy of an elderly SLR, a non-winding film, Boots,![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
broadmeadow and his negative scanner, and a bit of imagination, I present:
The April '04 Alternative Camgoth Photo
With optional Covgoth t-shirt in the background :)
Boots have developed the sections of film which weren't hopelessly overexposed, unexposed, or otherwise mangled, and chopped them up into fairly arbitrary frames. These are mostly useless, confused images of boats and trains and beaches.
However, one or two came out quite interesting. So, courtesy of an elderly SLR, a non-winding film, Boots,
broadmeadow and his negative scanner, and a bit of imagination, I present:The April '04 Alternative Camgoth Photo
With optional Covgoth t-shirt in the background :)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-06-15 08:24 am (UTC)I've forgotten what was the problem with the old one. Is it something which might plausibly be caused by an aspect of your treatment of it ? Or just bad CD karma ?