She stares at the screen, at the little words of green

[venta]

Does anyone know how to explain to PINE what email address you want your mail to appear to come from ?

By editing the .pinerc file, I've managed to get the domain-name part of the address set (thank you failmaster), but the part-before-the-@ seems to be stuck as my unix username. Changing the personal-name field in the .pinerc file doesn't help.

For curiosity value only, is it possible to set the domain name from within PINE's own config system ? It seems like it ought to be doable without editing the file directly, but I can't find any evidence of it.

In other news, The Calendar says today is the feast day of St Drogo, a patron of coffeehouse owners and a protector against "gravel" in the urine.

Which is nice. I had no idea that getting gravel in your urine was a risk, but if it is I damn well want to be protected from it.

Comments

[bateleur.livejournal.com]

Your reason for wanting to do it is the usual one, but what if you decide to send email from: someone_you_dislike@theirdomain.com to theirboss@bigcorporate.com with creatively chosen content of your own devising ?

[venta.livejournal.com]

Oh, yes, I'm aware that it's abusable. I was just explaining what I wanted to do in case someone was going to say "oh, well, in that case you want to do it like this" (or indeed tell me that spoofing the from was all I wanted to do).

(And anyway, the answer is I'd telnet to their mail host on port 25 :)

[bateleur.livejournal.com]

It should refuse either your connection or your forwarding request.

[onebyone.livejournal.com]

In which case you use a tame SMTP server to connect to the mail server of the person you're sending the message *to*.

Unless you're also blocking user-mode outbound connections on port 25 from every machine venta might ever be able to use, security in email clients is completely pointless for this purpose if the person being protected has any means of performing their own authentication (or reading the fucking list of IP addresses in the fucking headers), and not good enough if they don't.

On my hired shell account I can set pretty much any header field to pretty much anything I like, but I have not yet been able to get rid of the X-Envelope-Sender: header, and I certainly can't change the first "received from" header which identifies my username on the actual machine.

[venta.livejournal.com]

Unless you're also blocking user-mode outbound connections on port 25 from every machine venta might ever be able to use

And if he can, I shall start to feel extremely victimised.

Not to mention paranoid.

[waistcoatmark.livejournal.com]

Anyone who pays makes any important decisions based on the from: line shouldn't be allowed to make important decisions.

[bateleur.livejournal.com]

Nah - we're talking about faking the 'Sender:' line, get with the plot.

No non-programmer is ever going to check the Sender line, I just don't believe it.

[pm215]

Some flavours of Lotus Notes are so badly broken that they send mail to the address in Sender: if the user tries to do a normal 'reply' action...