Does anyone know how to explain to PINE what email address you want your mail to appear to come from ?
By editing the .pinerc file, I've managed to get the domain-name part of the address set (thank you
failmaster), but the part-before-the-@ seems to be stuck as my unix username. Changing the personal-name field in the .pinerc file doesn't help.
For curiosity value only, is it possible to set the domain name from within PINE's own config system ? It seems like it ought to be doable without editing the file directly, but I can't find any evidence of it.
In other news, The Calendar says today is the feast day of St Drogo, a patron of coffeehouse owners and a protector against "gravel" in the urine.
Which is nice. I had no idea that getting gravel in your urine was a risk, but if it is I damn well want to be protected from it.
By editing the .pinerc file, I've managed to get the domain-name part of the address set (thank you
For curiosity value only, is it possible to set the domain name from within PINE's own config system ? It seems like it ought to be doable without editing the file directly, but I can't find any evidence of it.
In other news, The Calendar says today is the feast day of St Drogo, a patron of coffeehouse owners and a protector against "gravel" in the urine.
Which is nice. I had no idea that getting gravel in your urine was a risk, but if it is I damn well want to be protected from it.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-16 03:45 am (UTC)I have bought a domain name, and some mail hosting. If I send mail shelled-in to the server which hosts my mail, it appears to be from username@nastynamefullofnumbers.com.
I'd like it to be from elizabeth@nicenewname.com.
It's currently appearing from username@nicenewname.com.
Though actually, now I come to look at the headers, I think it's only spoofing the from line anyway, I haven't changed anything 'really'.
So maybe your original suggestion is what I want, after all. It's a useful reference anyway, thanks!
no subject
no subject
Date: 2004-04-16 04:13 am (UTC)(And anyway, the answer is I'd telnet to their mail host on port 25 :)
no subject
Date: 2004-04-16 06:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-19 08:21 am (UTC)Unless you're also blocking user-mode outbound connections on port 25 from every machine venta might ever be able to use, security in email clients is completely pointless for this purpose if the person being protected has any means of performing their own authentication (or reading the fucking list of IP addresses in the fucking headers), and not good enough if they don't.
On my hired shell account I can set pretty much any header field to pretty much anything I like, but I have not yet been able to get rid of the X-Envelope-Sender: header, and I certainly can't change the first "received from" header which identifies my username on the actual machine.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-19 08:40 am (UTC)And if he can, I shall start to feel extremely victimised.
Not to mention paranoid.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-16 05:11 am (UTC)no subject
No non-programmer is ever going to check the Sender line, I just don't believe it.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-16 07:26 am (UTC)Some flavours of Lotus Notes are so badly broken that they send mail to the address in Sender: if the user tries to do a normal 'reply' action...