If I'm logged into LJ, and I open a new browser window, I appear to be logged in in the new window, too. And if I log out from there, it logs me out in both windows.
This didn't used to happen. And I'd like it not to. Have I inadvertently checked some option somewhere which I now can't find, or has something else changed ?
(I'm using IE/Windows 2K)
This didn't used to happen. And I'd like it not to. Have I inadvertently checked some option somewhere which I now can't find, or has something else changed ?
(I'm using IE/Windows 2K)
no subject
Date: 2004-03-26 07:41 am (UTC)Can I suggest as a more plausible excuse than pixies (which I assume is the
no subject
Date: 2004-03-26 07:49 am (UTC)(A bit more seriously: sometimes computers just do stuff which makes no sense. And I'm now going to try and remember the next time such a thing happens, and post it to see if you have an explanation ;-)
no subject
Date: 2004-03-26 07:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-26 07:57 am (UTC)It does, it does!
no subject
Date: 2004-03-26 09:25 am (UTC)And it's working properly for me now I'm at home. Another example of pixies, if you ask me.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-26 09:51 am (UTC)Check to see that you've got (deep breath)
Preferences -> Security & Privacy -> Images -> Animated Images should loop:
As many times as the image specifies
not Once, or Never
no subject
Date: 2004-03-26 10:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-26 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-26 07:00 pm (UTC)In the trade we call those "bugs". The reason they make no sense is because, by definition, a bug is when a computer isn't behaving the way it's expected to.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-26 08:30 am (UTC)At least, it's not possible if we assume that IE's cookie-handling isn't completely stuffed. Which I'd have thought someone would have noticed by now, if it were.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-26 08:54 am (UTC)Session length cookies are stored on a per process basis usually which means that different processes won't have access to them. If you're on heffajunk you may have seen tommy's question where lots of people assured him that what he wanted couldn't be done. These were all actually people *guessing* what the behaviour would be without actually investigating it. I suspect the same has happened here and peopel are saying what they expect to be the case rather than what they know to be the case.
Umm... That was probably rantier than it needed to be. I'm feelign ranty today though. Grr.. arghh..