venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
[Poll #230701]
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Date: 2004-01-09 01:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wimble.livejournal.com
And, somewhere, I've got documentation to prove it. 'fraid I've no longer got access to my usual references.

Date: 2004-01-09 01:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
[livejournal.com profile] beckyc -- This should be a ticky box so I can pick the top three. 1 and 2 would mean subtly different things.

Could you elaborate on that ? What would be the difference between endianity and endianness ?

Date: 2004-01-09 01:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arralethe.livejournal.com
Surely the adjective already comes from a noun, therefore extending it into another noun is purely bad grammar?

Date: 2004-01-09 02:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wimble.livejournal.com
Oh, for the record, the earliest citation of "endian" is from Gulliver's travels, according to which end of an egg should be cracked open first.

Really must clear the crap off my home machine!

Date: 2004-01-09 02:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nalsa.livejournal.com
I was thinking that, too. Surely it's just "end"?

Is this coming from "big endian" and "little endian"?

Date: 2004-01-09 02:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Is this coming from "big endian" and "little endian"?

Indeed.

So if I want to write something like "we can determine the endianness of x", using "end" just won't do.

Date: 2004-01-09 02:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Yep. As in "ten little, nine little, eight little endian..." !

Date: 2004-01-09 02:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Well, someone had to say it :)

Date: 2004-01-09 02:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] waistcoatmark.livejournal.com
It's always verbally referred to as endianness wherever I've worked, and a quick google shows that the double-n spelling is 4 times more prevalent than the single-n.

Date: 2004-01-09 02:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nalsa.livejournal.com
Mmm. You can't write "we can determine whether x is big or little endian..."?

Despite it being sensible geek language, "endian" is one of those words that Just Isn't Right. To me, at least.

Date: 2004-01-09 02:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nalsa.livejournal.com
Groan groan groan groan groan...

Date: 2004-01-09 02:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arralethe.livejournal.com
Ah, and here we have the split between Arts and Sciences, where the Arts people hold true to the belief that if you make up adjectives and nouns willy-nilly, as science people are wont to do, then you have only yourself to blame when your sentences don't work. So there. 8-p

Date: 2004-01-09 02:31 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Seems to me both "endianity" and "endianness" are correct, but there's no reason in the world why you couldn't just write "byte order".

--
Richard

Date: 2004-01-09 02:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] onebyone.livejournal.com

there's no reason in the world

Unless you're not talking about byte order. The concept also applies to dates, in which case 2004-01-09 is big endian, 9 January 2004 is little endian, and January 9, 2004 is middle endian. And eggs.

Date: 2004-01-09 02:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Well, if you let me know the official, will-nilly-free process for getting a new word when one is required, I'll follow it :)

Date: 2004-01-09 02:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
January 9, 2004 is middle endian

And it was all going so well.

Date: 2004-01-09 02:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] onebyone.livejournal.com

The point being that anything middle endian is automatically Just Wrong.

Date: 2004-01-09 02:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arralethe.livejournal.com
Sadly yet to be fully developed in this country as it is in France, where they actually have an Academy that decides these things (like whether to accept "le hotdog" and "le Big Mac"). Sometimes I think this country is so backward.....

Date: 2004-01-09 02:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beckyc.livejournal.com
Well, as an analogy, consider the words
purity
pureness
and note how you would typically use them in slightly different ways.

(OK, OK, I'm making it up ;-)

Date: 2004-01-09 02:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Er, I don't believe I've ever used the word pureness. Can someone put it in a sentence for me ?

Date: 2004-01-09 02:57 am (UTC)
ext_44: (mobius-scarf)
From: [identity profile] jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com
*convulses with laughter, nearly falls off chair*

Date: 2004-01-09 02:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Blimey... I didn't realise it was a Real Word, as opposed to something sad comptuer users had dreamed up.

And one notional kudo to [livejournal.com profile] onebyone.

Date: 2004-01-09 02:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Yeuch, the last thing we want is an Academie Anglaise.

Let's face it, I like making words up willy-nilly :)

Date: 2004-01-09 02:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Like the US ?

But seriously - it should be clear that big endian things are daft too. The only thing which persuades us even for a moment that big endian makes any sense at all is that we write big numbers with most significant digit on the left and yet we enumerate lists left to right.

Little endian is the One True Way. I want my entire computer to just store ONE BIG NUMBER !

(Plus, furthermore, "Ten little, nine little..." etc. !)

Date: 2004-01-09 02:59 am (UTC)
ext_44: (blank)
From: [identity profile] jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com
That's a rare one - a proper .sig separator on LiveJournal!

(How many points must that be worth for I-Spy LJ?)
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 10:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios