Page Summary
wimble.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
arralethe.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wimble.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nalsa.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bateleur.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
waistcoatmark.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nalsa.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nalsa.livejournal.com - (no subject)
arralethe.livejournal.com - (no subject)- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
onebyone.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
onebyone.livejournal.com - (no subject)
arralethe.livejournal.com - (no subject)
beckyc.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bateleur.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 01:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 01:56 am (UTC)Could you elaborate on that ? What would be the difference between endianity and endianness ?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:03 am (UTC)Really must clear the crap off my home machine!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:09 am (UTC)Is this coming from "big endian" and "little endian"?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:11 am (UTC)Indeed.
So if I want to write something like "we can determine the endianness of x", using "end" just won't do.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:16 am (UTC)Despite it being sensible geek language, "endian" is one of those words that Just Isn't Right. To me, at least.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:31 am (UTC)--
Richard
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:39 am (UTC)there's no reason in the world
Unless you're not talking about byte order. The concept also applies to dates, in which case 2004-01-09 is big endian, 9 January 2004 is little endian, and January 9, 2004 is middle endian. And eggs.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:40 am (UTC)And it was all going so well.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:42 am (UTC)The point being that anything middle endian is automatically Just Wrong.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:53 am (UTC)purity
pureness
and note how you would typically use them in slightly different ways.
(OK, OK, I'm making it up ;-)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:57 am (UTC)no subject
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:57 am (UTC)And one notional kudo to
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:59 am (UTC)Let's face it, I like making words up willy-nilly :)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:59 am (UTC)But seriously - it should be clear that big endian things are daft too. The only thing which persuades us even for a moment that big endian makes any sense at all is that we write big numbers with most significant digit on the left and yet we enumerate lists left to right.
Little endian is the One True Way. I want my entire computer to just store ONE BIG NUMBER !
(Plus, furthermore, "Ten little, nine little..." etc. !)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-09 02:59 am (UTC)(How many points must that be worth for I-Spy LJ?)