Last week, ChrisC and I got some post. It turns out to be a ticky-box survey each from Mr Cameron, asking for our opinions on how to run the country.
Since I've yet to find anyone else who's received this survey, I assume he has chosen us as his special advisers. I had no idea the Tory party was in such disarray.
Anyway, I've filled it in this morning. And written a snitty letter to go with it, pointing out that every single questions is at least one of (a) leading, (b) reductive, (c) intrusive or (d) plain stupid.
Here's an example. From this list of topics, you have to choose three issues which are "most important for YOU AND YOUR FAMILY":
For a start, choosing three suggests the things are all independent. I'll freely admit that my grasp of economics is shaky, but I'm pretty sure that the deficit/debt situation pretty much underpins the funding available for the other options.
I strongly suspect an attempt to skew the results by including "schools", "opportunities for the next generation" and "tuition fees" as three separate items.
I particularly like that we're supposed to infer what exactly we're supporting by ticking a box. Let's assume that by ticking "crime and anti-social behaviour" we're saying we want less of it. But by ticking "EU", are we asking for more or it, or less?
I pointed out in my letter than I would have ticked welfare, were it not for the tagline "rewarding hard work". I'm not being used as a statistic to justify the way the current government has behaved over disability benefits.
If you enjoyed that question, you can do it all over again to answer which three of those seventeen things are "most important for the COUNTRY AS A WHOLE". You know, I'd have thought the government was better placed to know that than I am, but there you go. You can't make your policies populist if you don't know what people want.
The whole tone of the questionnaire is very much about "rewarding the hard-working taxpayer". Speaking as a hard-working taxpayer, I'd like it to be known that we're not all smug, self-centred bastards intent only on reducing our own bill from HMRC each year.
I declined to answer the question about how I voted in the last election. Partly because, y'know, secret ballot but also because it was included "to help make the survey results representative". I would love to know how, statistically speaking, they justify that.
The final question asked me to indicate how likely I was to vote for various parties in the upcoming election, where 0 is "hell no" and 10 is "get me a rosette, now". They asked about Labour, LibDem, Conservative and UKIP as if UKIP were a real party, but it really did make me realise that, right now, I don't think I can countenance voting for anyone who stands any chance of winning :(
Anyway, I've worked off some of my bile writing to Mr Cameron. I did find myself getting more and more Disgusted of Tunbridge as I went, with my language getting so up itself I had to restrain myself from breaking out "behove" as a word[*]. I signed my name with all the post-nominals I can rake up; I'm not sure I've ever done that before. Clearly interacting with our illustrious leader makes me inclined to try and beat people over the head with strings of letters :(
[*] Contrary to natural inclination, I did not begin my letter "Darling Fascist Bully-boy..."
Since I've yet to find anyone else who's received this survey, I assume he has chosen us as his special advisers. I had no idea the Tory party was in such disarray.
Anyway, I've filled it in this morning. And written a snitty letter to go with it, pointing out that every single questions is at least one of (a) leading, (b) reductive, (c) intrusive or (d) plain stupid.
Here's an example. From this list of topics, you have to choose three issues which are "most important for YOU AND YOUR FAMILY":
| The EU | Welfare - rewarding hard work | The cost of living |
| Immigration | Childcare | The level of taxes |
| Schools | The NHS | Opportunities for the next generation |
| Tax credits & benefits to support working families | The environment & climate change | Care & support for the elderly |
| Crime & anti-social behaviour | Unemployment | Britain's deficit & debt |
| University tuition fees | Affordable housing |
For a start, choosing three suggests the things are all independent. I'll freely admit that my grasp of economics is shaky, but I'm pretty sure that the deficit/debt situation pretty much underpins the funding available for the other options.
I strongly suspect an attempt to skew the results by including "schools", "opportunities for the next generation" and "tuition fees" as three separate items.
I particularly like that we're supposed to infer what exactly we're supporting by ticking a box. Let's assume that by ticking "crime and anti-social behaviour" we're saying we want less of it. But by ticking "EU", are we asking for more or it, or less?
I pointed out in my letter than I would have ticked welfare, were it not for the tagline "rewarding hard work". I'm not being used as a statistic to justify the way the current government has behaved over disability benefits.
If you enjoyed that question, you can do it all over again to answer which three of those seventeen things are "most important for the COUNTRY AS A WHOLE". You know, I'd have thought the government was better placed to know that than I am, but there you go. You can't make your policies populist if you don't know what people want.
The whole tone of the questionnaire is very much about "rewarding the hard-working taxpayer". Speaking as a hard-working taxpayer, I'd like it to be known that we're not all smug, self-centred bastards intent only on reducing our own bill from HMRC each year.
I declined to answer the question about how I voted in the last election. Partly because, y'know, secret ballot but also because it was included "to help make the survey results representative". I would love to know how, statistically speaking, they justify that.
The final question asked me to indicate how likely I was to vote for various parties in the upcoming election, where 0 is "hell no" and 10 is "get me a rosette, now". They asked about Labour, LibDem, Conservative and UKIP as if UKIP were a real party, but it really did make me realise that, right now, I don't think I can countenance voting for anyone who stands any chance of winning :(
Anyway, I've worked off some of my bile writing to Mr Cameron. I did find myself getting more and more Disgusted of Tunbridge as I went, with my language getting so up itself I had to restrain myself from breaking out "behove" as a word[*]. I signed my name with all the post-nominals I can rake up; I'm not sure I've ever done that before. Clearly interacting with our illustrious leader makes me inclined to try and beat people over the head with strings of letters :(
[*] Contrary to natural inclination, I did not begin my letter "Darling Fascist Bully-boy..."
no subject
Date: 2014-08-10 06:25 pm (UTC)The fact that it was from the tories was very hidden, I recall saying I would not vote for them, but ticked the box "always delighted to attend and participate in any focus groups you might care to run or answer further questions in person."
Despite the fact that surely no one ever volunteers for focus groups or extra feedback opportunities they never got back to me.
no subject
Date: 2014-08-11 07:54 am (UTC)