Be a woman, take it like a man.
Jun. 6th, 2013 11:02 amA while back I noticed posters advertising a "protein shake" called, I think, Upbeat and made a note to try it. I figured it was a potentially interesting snack-concept for days when I want to go straight from work to, say, a yoga class without keeling over. (Lots of other interesting snack-concepts are also available but hey, I quite like milkshake).
This morning, outside Ealing Broadway station, there were gentlemen in leather jackets handing out free samples of a chocolate "40% higher protein" milkshake called Wing-Co. Obviously protein shakes are the new Thing. Wing-Co has a blocky cartoon of a WWII-era pilot (his moustache dripping chocolate milk) on the bottle, and small planes whizzing past the nutritional information.
It's pretty nice, actually. Chocolate milkshake is very variable and often has a nasty, grainy texture but I enjoyed this one. Whether it can actually make good on its promise to "shoot down hunger, fast" remains to be seen. But I could imagine buying it again.
Except...
As the free-samplers were dishing out the bottles this morning, they said "Man up with Wing-Co!" to everyone they handed one to. According to the info box on the label, "WING-CO IS PROPER MAN FUEL". "DON'T BE A GIRL," it further elaborates, "SHAKE IT UP AND DRINK IT NOW!"
Oh. Good.
The info box is, of course, designed to look like a plate which has been screwed onto the bottle. Because, y'know, screws are very manly (they look like slotted-head countersunk woodscrews to me).
Think I'll try out Upbeat after all. In fact, Wing-Co has inspired me to compare the two, and Upbeat has real fruit in it, and more protein, and is made entirely from British milk.
This morning, outside Ealing Broadway station, there were gentlemen in leather jackets handing out free samples of a chocolate "40% higher protein" milkshake called Wing-Co. Obviously protein shakes are the new Thing. Wing-Co has a blocky cartoon of a WWII-era pilot (his moustache dripping chocolate milk) on the bottle, and small planes whizzing past the nutritional information.
It's pretty nice, actually. Chocolate milkshake is very variable and often has a nasty, grainy texture but I enjoyed this one. Whether it can actually make good on its promise to "shoot down hunger, fast" remains to be seen. But I could imagine buying it again.
Except...
As the free-samplers were dishing out the bottles this morning, they said "Man up with Wing-Co!" to everyone they handed one to. According to the info box on the label, "WING-CO IS PROPER MAN FUEL". "DON'T BE A GIRL," it further elaborates, "SHAKE IT UP AND DRINK IT NOW!"
Oh. Good.
The info box is, of course, designed to look like a plate which has been screwed onto the bottle. Because, y'know, screws are very manly (they look like slotted-head countersunk woodscrews to me).
Think I'll try out Upbeat after all. In fact, Wing-Co has inspired me to compare the two, and Upbeat has real fruit in it, and more protein, and is made entirely from British milk.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 10:36 am (UTC)Presumably an attempt to counter the notion that diets are somehow girly?
no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 10:42 am (UTC)The marketing I've seen for these thus far don't seem to be diet-orientated, more aimed at terribly busy people who need to keep going until they can fit their next meal in.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 10:45 am (UTC)Gosh - I haven't heard that one before... that's quite horrifying. :-/
no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 10:45 am (UTC)An affronted letter explaining exactly why you won't be buying their product in future, in spite of actually liking the taste, might add at least one small drop to the ocean that will eventually (I dearly hope) sweep this bullshit away. I'd certainly be interested to see their reply.
Actually, a quick look on Twitter for references to 'Wing-Co' shows that quite a few people are vocally complaining about their sexism there already. The manufacturers, Arla Foods, have an account there, so should see any tweets which mention it. Is it OK with you if I link to this post on Twitter and copy them in?
no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 10:48 am (UTC)"...it’s best to have protein as part of every meal and snack…not always easy if you're on the go. Most of us don’t get enough protein early on in the day and it’s not until the evening meal that we tend to get a good amount of high quality protein – generally from meat or fish. We understand that busy lifestyles mean getting a balance of all the right nutrients at each meal or snack isn't always easy."
I hadn't seen it as a diet-related product, but on reflection that might just be because I don't think of diets much.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 10:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 10:54 am (UTC)I couldn't think, myself, of a way of complaining that I felt would make the point. I don't find it offensive, I just find it a bit... well, a bit shit, really. And a bit disappointing. If they're going to go for such a low-rent ad campaign, then I suspect their response would be along the lines of "haha typical girl can't even take a joke".
no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 10:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 11:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 11:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 11:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 11:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 12:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 01:43 pm (UTC)They're pointing out that you can have too much protein, which I guess the marketing blurb for the shakes rather glosses over.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 02:26 pm (UTC)I can't think what the academic "perfect game" strategy would be.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 02:43 pm (UTC)Over time, and especially at present when there really do seem to be more and more voices uniting against sexism, I would hope that the economic penalties associated with sexist marketing would become strong enough to mean that companies did not want to incur them just for the sake of the benefits which they could then reap by turning into one of the 'good guys' - i.e. it would be more beneficial just to be one of the good guys in the first place.
But that's an optimistic view, which will only works if there is genuinely an overall economic penalty associated with this kind of marketing. At the moment, the makers of Wing-Co clearly think exactly the opposite.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 03:56 pm (UTC)Either that or they just don't think in a way that makes this kind of marketing seem problematic.
We live in our comfortable little filter bubbles online, forgetting what the world is like. If "everyone" agrees on something here, that might only be 10% or even 1% of people out in the real world.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-06 10:22 pm (UTC)aiming at a moutached audience
Date: 2013-06-06 10:29 pm (UTC)...really?
no subject
Date: 2013-06-07 12:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-07 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-07 09:45 am (UTC)Re: aiming at a moutached audience
Date: 2013-06-07 10:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-07 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-12 02:45 am (UTC)