There will be some proper content shortly. Maybe.
However... in the interim...
I don't mind people making up words. I do it all the time, after all. But there are some neologisms which just make my skin crawl.
I was reminded of this at lunchtime when a colleague included the word "chillaxin'" in a sentence[*]; it's possibly my least-favourite word from the last few years.
Any advance on chillaxing in the horribleness stakes? Has to be a word with at least some level of usage, not something one of your mates said once.
[*] Admittedly, I suspect he did this chiefly because he thought it would make my skin crawl.
However... in the interim...
I don't mind people making up words. I do it all the time, after all. But there are some neologisms which just make my skin crawl.
I was reminded of this at lunchtime when a colleague included the word "chillaxin'" in a sentence[*]; it's possibly my least-favourite word from the last few years.
Any advance on chillaxing in the horribleness stakes? Has to be a word with at least some level of usage, not something one of your mates said once.
[*] Admittedly, I suspect he did this chiefly because he thought it would make my skin crawl.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-04 07:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-04 08:10 am (UTC)Then you get things like "medalling" in the Olympics. Which is horrible, thanks to its homophone also being in-context.
no subject
Date: 2013-06-04 08:30 am (UTC)Mm, I also dislike 'to medal' for its ugliness: but I don't have that problem with your examples 'workshop' and 'action', both of which I use as cheerfully as I do 'contact'. I think having personal taste objections to particular examples is fair enough, but to decry a whole category of word formation seems a bit extreme.