I do try not to harp on about grammar. I really do. A lot of the time someone misses out an apostrophe and hey, it's wrong, but I knew what they meant. I know my punctuation isn't always perfect either.
But, dear BBC, you are a reputable journalistic institution. And that missing hyphen completely changed the meaning of the headline.
Child killer Robert Black found guilty of murdering Jennifer Cardy tells me that Robert Black, who is under 18, is guilty of murdering Jennifer Cardy.
What you meant was Child-killer Robert Black found guilty of murdering Jennifer Cardy, ie Robert Black, a convicted killer of children, is guilty of murdering Jennifer Cardy.
Flippin' sort it out.
I do take it as read that, due to the law of St Sod, I will have misplaced at least one apostrophe in this post.
But, dear BBC, you are a reputable journalistic institution. And that missing hyphen completely changed the meaning of the headline.
Child killer Robert Black found guilty of murdering Jennifer Cardy tells me that Robert Black, who is under 18, is guilty of murdering Jennifer Cardy.
What you meant was Child-killer Robert Black found guilty of murdering Jennifer Cardy, ie Robert Black, a convicted killer of children, is guilty of murdering Jennifer Cardy.
Flippin' sort it out.
I do take it as read that, due to the law of St Sod, I will have misplaced at least one apostrophe in this post.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 01:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 03:20 pm (UTC)I actually did laugh out loud. Though kind of quietly.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 01:59 pm (UTC)I think "child-killer" would not be particularly helpful in the first headline - and "child killer" certainly isn't - because either the named victim is a child, in which case it's redundant to call the convicted killer a child-killer in the headline, or he has previously been convicted of killing a child and this named victim is an adult, in which case it's confusing and also somewhat irrelevant. But why let that get in the way of whipping up a good furore, eh?
no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 04:28 pm (UTC)It makes me happy :)
(Though not actually happy enough to go in and eat there, it seems.)