venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
So, last night a controversial bill passed its third reading. This isn't obvious: even the BBC carries only a mashed-over story covering people's comment on what would happen if the bill were passed, with a sentence buried a couple of paragraphs in mentioning that it was passed last night by a majority of 142. Is there a rule about not reporting such stories until the Queen's corgi has formally licked it or something ?

As far as I can tell, via a friendly Guardian blog, the only people who showed up to the actual debate part were those who were against and Stephen Timms, the fantastically-titled Minister for Digital Britain; everyone else just trundled in at the end to vote with the Whips.

Can anyone tell me how to deduce which way my MP voted ? Public Whip doesn't seem to be having April yet.

Date: 2010-04-08 10:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
That sounds like he was supporting the bill, or at least that clause of it.

Strange that he specifically mentions SLF and the Undertones. SLF were famously screwed over by Island Records, while Sharkey is famously a commercial record industry mouthpiece.

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 12:26 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios