So, last night a controversial bill passed its third reading. This isn't obvious: even the BBC carries only a mashed-over story covering people's comment on what would happen if the bill were passed, with a sentence buried a couple of paragraphs in mentioning that it was passed last night by a majority of 142. Is there a rule about not reporting such stories until the Queen's corgi has formally licked it or something ?
As far as I can tell, via a friendly Guardian blog, the only people who showed up to the actual debate part were those who were against and Stephen Timms, the fantastically-titled Minister for Digital Britain; everyone else just trundled in at the end to vote with the Whips.
Can anyone tell me how to deduce which way my MP voted ? Public Whip doesn't seem to be having April yet.
As far as I can tell, via a friendly Guardian blog, the only people who showed up to the actual debate part were those who were against and Stephen Timms, the fantastically-titled Minister for Digital Britain; everyone else just trundled in at the end to vote with the Whips.
Can anyone tell me how to deduce which way my MP voted ? Public Whip doesn't seem to be having April yet.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-08 10:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-08 10:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-08 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-09 07:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-09 08:19 am (UTC)Hmm. Is this a common thing, or peculiar to my family? Ah, no... it's a common thing, Wikipedia has an article about it and everything (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_ink) :)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-08 10:52 am (UTC)Strange that he specifically mentions SLF and the Undertones. SLF were famously screwed over by Island Records, while Sharkey is famously a commercial record industry mouthpiece.