Just because I'm curious:
[Poll #1545633]
This was brought to you following a promotional visit from some Mueller people to our office, dishing out free raspberry Mueller rice, and the discovery that a colleague of mine has never eaten rice pud and had no idea what it was like.
[Poll #1545633]
This was brought to you following a promotional visit from some Mueller people to our office, dishing out free raspberry Mueller rice, and the discovery that a colleague of mine has never eaten rice pud and had no idea what it was like.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 11:48 am (UTC)Damn, no milk in the house.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 11:52 am (UTC)Incidentally, in answer to your cooking advice: which bit of "put milk, sugar and rice in bowl, put in oven" is too much effort ? Not intended to be a facetious question, I do want to know. I like cooking, so am prepared to make effort, but even to someone who doesn't I'd have thought rice pud was at the very low end of the scale of effortfulness.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 12:11 pm (UTC)For some reason which I'm not going to state on an unlocked post because it is very strange, I think it is odd to make rice pudding with rice milk. But it tastes fine, so that's the important thing.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 12:17 pm (UTC)Rice pudding with rice milk seems reasonable if you don't do dairy stuff. I've been recommended making it with coconut milk, too - which sounds yummy if not cooking for people with coconut issues :)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 12:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 12:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 12:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 12:40 pm (UTC)thingsfoods with skin on them. (It's a texture thing.)I do rather like the tinned stuff, though ...
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 12:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 12:54 pm (UTC)Ditto!
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 12:56 pm (UTC)AIUIBIANAD it's not a very common allergen (also not a nut from that POV), but some people can't readily digest it. Don't know the mechanism - too rich, perhaps?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 12:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 01:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 01:56 pm (UTC)I like the suggestions of cardamom above, I'll have to give that a go. It's commonly used in Indian milky puds, so I should have thought of it myself really.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 02:28 pm (UTC)Probably why it's yummy :)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 02:33 pm (UTC)We did used to drink (diluted) rosehip syrup at home, though. Where, because it was sold as suitable for small persons, it was always known as "baby juice".
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 02:36 pm (UTC)Homemade kind is great, though.
Don't be fooled by Waitrose "low fat" macaroni cheese ready meals, though. They made it low fat by (as far as I can tell) not putting any cheese in it. On the plus side, when I complained they sent me some Waitrose vouchers.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 03:19 pm (UTC)Actually, now I come to think of it, you could probably do a great shrikhand/amrakhand style rice pudding, too...
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 04:00 pm (UTC)Rice should be savoury, like meat, and preferably served savory with meat!
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 05:34 pm (UTC)This seems to have been a cunning ploy to ensure that after asking 'Can I have the scab, please?' in public, nobody else would want it.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 05:35 pm (UTC)Usually known at school as 'frogspawn', for reasons that will be instantly apparently should you ever see some.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 05:40 pm (UTC)I encouraged this name, as it meant there was more for me when no one else wanted seconds. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-31 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-01 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-02 08:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-04 10:21 am (UTC)