venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
If we assume that:

(a) most people don't bother voting in elections[*]
(b) people are more likely to complain when they don't like something than offer praise when they do

does it follow that parties like UKIP will always do well in elections for MEPs ?

[*] Turn-out figures show that about 1 in 3 people voted in the European elections last week.

Date: 2009-06-08 07:14 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
On a more general electoral point. Where is the box on the ballot paper saying NONE OF THE ABOVE ARE CREDIBLE OR ACCEPTABLE! Come the next general election we need 100% turnout and, under current systems, 100% spoiled votes to truly express our views about parasitical, self-serving, deceitful moral cripples who either see politics as a career (where keeping their job is more important than any strong convictions), or are in politics for direct or indirect personal benefit. Apologies to the very small minority of MPs who actually put their constituents above personal or party policy. Rant now over.....till November.

Date: 2009-06-08 11:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hjalfi.livejournal.com
Draw a big X across the whole thing and post it --- it'll be counted as 'spoiled ballot', and is the standard way of saying 'I bothered to come out and vote but there weren't any candidates I wanted to vote for'.

Unfortunately the BBC news coverage (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/elections/euro/09/html/ukregion_999999.stm) doesn't actually say how many there were; I'd be interested to know... but it might be instructive to add up all the different numbers of votes and see if it makes up the total.

Date: 2009-06-09 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Indeed my usual practice is to turn up and "spoil" my vote in the event of there being no acceptable candidates. But some other people spoil their votes by accident. If spoiling my vote I write "none of these are acceptable", but in the counting of votes this is not distinguished from spoilt votes by the incompetent. Hence the need for a special box.

Date: 2009-06-09 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
I've always thought this, then heard someone on the radio the other day who gave me pause.

Politicians are (notionally) people who want to change the world for the better. Thus if there are no candidates acceptable to you, there's a very obvious solution: stand yourself.

Now, I have no intention of standing as an MP myself. However, I do have to appreciate that candidates are not created out of thin air. If you view the current crop of MPs as "parasitical, self-serving, deceitful moral cripples", and thus presumably past redemption, where do you think replacements will come from in the event of 100% spoiled votes ?

Date: 2009-06-09 09:59 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Ah! You are forgetting that the vast majority of the current batch put themselves forward for the job. A few genuinely wishing to better the lot of their fellow man; but sadly most in it for themselves. 100% spoiled votes (clearly spoiled on purpose) IS the public vote of no confidence. The aim is to force a change in the system of how MPs are selected as candidates, and possibly a review of our first past the post elections.

I'm not necessarily in favour of PR. That could actually encourage the present Party First situation. With PR you vote for your party of choice, they choose from a list of candidate MPs, there is no local connection. At least with our present system there is the possibility of electing MPs who have their roots and a personal interest in their constituency. Also if they really live there, rather than buying a house purely to qualify as a candidate for the constituency, they can be seen, and indeed should be made, to be accountable for the way in which they represent their constituents.

But with the majority of MPs simply following party policy, because their job depends on it; and the current arrangements where key party members (and especially high profile transfers from other parties) are placed as the candidates for "safe" seats, we DO NOT have real local accountability.

A fine example. Local politicians want to demolish a popular public hall for a new retail development, in a Wiltshire town. They are informed by the local electorate that they will no longer be welcome in any business premises, they will be denied services by local businesses and tradespeople, indeed they will have to leave the area and move away to lead a normal life. The hall is still in use, I was dancing there at Whitsun. Accountability is important. We do not have it with the way the current party system works.

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 12:00 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios