And the moon sinks low in Scorpio
Jan. 25th, 2005 12:12 pmThis is something I've been meaning to experiment with for ages, but never got round to. I've just been reminded of it, because someone posted on a thread elsewhere with the assumption that "birthdays are randomly distributed" - which I've always assumed they're not. For a start, there's always a bit of a clump of birthdays round February/March, which I've always blamed on people having early summer holidays in June.
Now, I'm assuming that unlike, say, musical taste, incidence of birthdays among my friends list will at least be representative of the population as a whole. If not, then we're into the suggestion that being born in a particular month predisposes you to particular behaviours and that smacks of astrology, so I don't like it.
(Yes, I know there are other non-astrological factors which might be relevant, but let's give it a whirl, shall we?)
You're getting no tickyboxes for this, dammit, it's radio or nothing. I refuse to allow people to be born in more than one month.
[Poll #424559]
Now, I'm assuming that unlike, say, musical taste, incidence of birthdays among my friends list will at least be representative of the population as a whole. If not, then we're into the suggestion that being born in a particular month predisposes you to particular behaviours and that smacks of astrology, so I don't like it.
(Yes, I know there are other non-astrological factors which might be relevant, but let's give it a whirl, shall we?)
You're getting no tickyboxes for this, dammit, it's radio or nothing. I refuse to allow people to be born in more than one month.
[Poll #424559]
Re: Some more data points...
Date: 2005-01-25 01:21 pm (UTC)I wonder too how many people read because other people have mentioned something, or they read it on a friendsfriends page, or whatever, and hence might fill in a poll like this.
Re: Some more data points...
Date: 2005-01-25 01:25 pm (UTC)Also, people on my friends list and people who read this journal regularly are non-identical subsets of LJ users :)
Re: Some more data points...
Date: 2005-01-25 02:08 pm (UTC)Which isn't scientific, but I would think is good enough to be indicative.
Re: Some more data points...
Date: 2005-01-25 02:13 pm (UTC)Now I suppose I have to dig out the A-level stats, and attempt to remember how to do proper significance testing. Ouch.
Re: Some more data points...
Date: 2005-01-25 02:16 pm (UTC)Re: Some more data points...
Date: 2005-01-25 02:17 pm (UTC)Re: Some more data points...
Date: 2005-01-25 02:46 pm (UTC)The sample isn't, of course, perfectly random: it includes all our staff, which probably is random, but also all our students for the past N years. For a single year, there are probably peculiarities introduced by the period of the academic year, simililar to the school year (eg. hypothetically, we could get fewer students who's birthday is late in the school year, as they decide to defer). I'm hoping that by simply hoovering many years, those boundary effects will cancel out.