And the moon sinks low in Scorpio
Jan. 25th, 2005 12:12 pmThis is something I've been meaning to experiment with for ages, but never got round to. I've just been reminded of it, because someone posted on a thread elsewhere with the assumption that "birthdays are randomly distributed" - which I've always assumed they're not. For a start, there's always a bit of a clump of birthdays round February/March, which I've always blamed on people having early summer holidays in June.
Now, I'm assuming that unlike, say, musical taste, incidence of birthdays among my friends list will at least be representative of the population as a whole. If not, then we're into the suggestion that being born in a particular month predisposes you to particular behaviours and that smacks of astrology, so I don't like it.
(Yes, I know there are other non-astrological factors which might be relevant, but let's give it a whirl, shall we?)
You're getting no tickyboxes for this, dammit, it's radio or nothing. I refuse to allow people to be born in more than one month.
[Poll #424559]
Now, I'm assuming that unlike, say, musical taste, incidence of birthdays among my friends list will at least be representative of the population as a whole. If not, then we're into the suggestion that being born in a particular month predisposes you to particular behaviours and that smacks of astrology, so I don't like it.
(Yes, I know there are other non-astrological factors which might be relevant, but let's give it a whirl, shall we?)
You're getting no tickyboxes for this, dammit, it's radio or nothing. I refuse to allow people to be born in more than one month.
[Poll #424559]
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:23 pm (UTC)(You'd think I'd know this sort of thing...)
Though it's still related to seasonal factors, such as the cut-off date after which you go into the next year's class :)
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:23 pm (UTC)Y'see, I was always the absolute youngest I could be to be in my class - born Aug 31st. You many consider this explains a lot :)
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:26 pm (UTC)If you went to school in Durham LEA, you went into exactly the class for your age range - if you were way ahead or way behind at any stage, it was just tough.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:30 pm (UTC)Which it may have been. I wouldn't put anything past those Virgoans.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:34 pm (UTC)What is the difference between eldest and oldest, anyway ?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:38 pm (UTC)And I think the difference between eldest and oldest is the extra little curve on the bottom of the first letter.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:41 pm (UTC)So "oldest" means the one who's the most old, and eldest means the one to the left of the dealer. Although arguably that usage might be pretentious too.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:42 pm (UTC)I believe it's sometime in early March, as both my daughters, born on March and May, are amongst the oldest in their respective classes. Although, poking round the web, it seems that it's variable, depending on the education authorities' whim, but it's always sometime in February-March.
November?
Date: 2005-01-25 12:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:49 pm (UTC)Er... being born in a particular time of year emphatically does predispose you to particular behaviours, doesn't it? I thought it was the only reasonable explanation for Astrology there was going...
Admittedly, in the last 50 years or so the most obvious yearly variation of diet in the western world has rather homogenised, since nowadays you can bring up kids on pizza, sunny delight and chips all year round, but things like day length, external temperature and so on must still have quite a developmental effect. Or at least, I've always thought so...
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:49 pm (UTC)[*]Actually, I didn't. I'm an only child. But most people thought he was my brother. And he would have squashed them anyway.
Re: November?
Date: 2005-01-25 12:50 pm (UTC)Re: November?
Date: 2005-01-25 12:51 pm (UTC)Peaks in my friends are in October and May, according to:
http://www.livejournal.com/birthdays.bml
though the most popular single say is apparently January 13th.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 12:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 01:00 pm (UTC)Not sure what that's supposed to mean mind...
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 01:02 pm (UTC)I think all the Pisceans are deliberately avoiding filling in this poll just to make me look stupid. Bastards.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 01:02 pm (UTC)Does astrology require a reasonable explanation? For example, does it make any verifiable claims about birthday-dependent personality characteristcs?
things like day length, external temperature and so on must still have quite a developmental effect.
Do you mean that it's entirely plausible that they would have an effect, or that you'd be extremely surprised if there weren't any (observable) effects?
Some more data points...
Date: 2005-01-25 01:07 pm (UTC)And yes, this does leave out the roleplaying characters' birthdays :)
My friends seem to follow the opposite trends to yours, which is odd as some of them are the same people.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 01:08 pm (UTC)