Another one for the ????
Feb. 3rd, 2004 02:05 pmDriving back from a bakery-raid with
grumblesmurf, he asked if I was familiar with the word chav.
I wasn't - apparently it means approximately the same as pikey. I was just filing this away in my mental Bag Of Words, when it suddenly occurred to me that it's basically the same word as charver.
Charver (spelling optional, I've only ever heard it said) was the insult of choice among some friends back in Darlington about three or four years ago. Again it (or its bizare relative charver-ding) were used in the same way pikey gets (mis)used, to mean anything from "thieving gipsy" to "scruffy little bastard".
Around at the same time was rarfer(-ding), again with the same meaning. I don't think I've heard them since, so they were maybe never particularly common currency.
Any offers, anyone ?
And I think I need a new phrase inventing: what do you call a bunch of people (that's you lot :) to whom you can pose questions, and whose collective brain you can trawl for information ? Something of the search engine, something of the test audience, something of the lab rat. Any ideas ?
I wasn't - apparently it means approximately the same as pikey. I was just filing this away in my mental Bag Of Words, when it suddenly occurred to me that it's basically the same word as charver.
Charver (spelling optional, I've only ever heard it said) was the insult of choice among some friends back in Darlington about three or four years ago. Again it (or its bizare relative charver-ding) were used in the same way pikey gets (mis)used, to mean anything from "thieving gipsy" to "scruffy little bastard".
Around at the same time was rarfer(-ding), again with the same meaning. I don't think I've heard them since, so they were maybe never particularly common currency.
Any offers, anyone ?
And I think I need a new phrase inventing: what do you call a bunch of people (that's you lot :) to whom you can pose questions, and whose collective brain you can trawl for information ? Something of the search engine, something of the test audience, something of the lab rat. Any ideas ?
They could
Date: 2004-02-03 07:29 am (UTC)and seeing that it would be the starring role in big movie I doubt that.
Yes I fear the whole thing would be so broken ... and still I would have to go and see it, just in case it isn't dreddful.
Well I just found this (http://www.screenwritersutopia.com/script_reviews/v_for_vendetta.html).A script review for a V script by the Wachowski brothers ... even though I don't neccessarily agree with the writer of thhe article I am still sure that 95% sure it'll be rubbish.
We can only wait and watch ...
Re: They could
Date: 2004-02-03 08:35 am (UTC)It's a Moore Book for gawd sake. It's not filmable! Certainly not trying to keep 1/100 of the story he crams into the story. The only way to ever do this is to slice out the detail and try and keep the heart. And frankly, I've seen league of extrodianry gentlemen.
And that guy should really read the graphic novel. I know I was worried when he refered to it as 'graphic novel'.
But sadly it might happen. Moore has shown that he is willing to, in the words of Gamen "watch his children get bbq'd" for cash.
Re: They could
Date: 2004-02-03 08:47 am (UTC)Re: They could
No... wait... AWFUL ! Never go near a film set. Ever !
To me it seems he only read the script
Date: 2004-02-03 08:50 am (UTC)Hellblazer, you see ... some bits of it could translate nicely, and so I will have to go and see that, yet I fear it will be another 'cheap' copy.
V ... well yes quite ... I think the guy missed the point a little, or maybe he is speaking for typical modern audiences where they don't want to think ...
League ... well most certainly an entertaining watch but no comparison ... I mean I like Sean ... but he needed to be darker ... more ... well bad side to him and not quite so Hollywood ... but hey ... still a movie I will watch again some afternoon ...
Well ... Neil Gaiman is looking at making a film ... which should be grand ... when I found out I wrote this ... post in my LJ (http://lambertbehnke.livejournal.com/63034.html) which I hope will be fab. Of course this is different as he is not cashing in on previous work ...
Re: They could
Date: 2004-02-03 09:07 am (UTC)Good lord, they haven't, have they ?
I read ages back that there were steps in the pipeline to make a Hellblazer film set in NYC, with Constantine a NY citizen. And then I heard that it had been shelved, and there was much rejoicing.
Constantine practically is London, I can't see how it'll translate.
Hmmm... who would we like to see play Constantine ? I'd have thought Hellblazer much more filmable than V for Vendetta: I think it could actually be done well. Much more filmable than From Hell, too :)
Re: They could
Date: 2004-02-03 09:21 am (UTC)And your right, hellblazer is much more filmable. And still they c*ck it up that much! what chance would V have of being made for the love of god!
Picture on this page.
http://www.comicscontinuum.com/stories/0401/07/index.htm
Shudder. Although nice effect's.....
Re: They could
Date: 2004-02-03 11:16 am (UTC)You can't make me look at the pictures!
Re: They could
Date: 2004-02-03 07:41 pm (UTC)Constantine is from LA.
The archangel Gabriel is a woman.
Hell is actually a small suburb of Chicago.
That last I'm making up. Either that, or I'm giving clueless WB execs ideas.
Re: They could
Date: 2004-02-04 01:35 am (UTC)Re: They could
Date: 2004-02-04 01:38 am (UTC)Re: They could
Date: 2004-02-04 01:35 am (UTC)who would we like to see play Constantine
The original rumours were for Nicholas Cage. Keanu is the punishment the Moore-loving world gets for saying "no, no, you can't have Constantine played by Cage, that would be ridiculous".
What with From Hell, LXG and now this, I think we can confirm the well-known claim that "Alan Moore / knows the score". The score is that you make more money from bad movies than good comics. I reckon the next ought to be Top 10: at least that was supposed to be a farce.