The hardship...
Nov. 28th, 2003 02:14 pmToday I am working from home.
This means that instead of the nice, big, fat mp3 collection which lives on my work hard drive, I'm actually having to listen to, like, CDs. And I have to get up and walk across the room when I want to change CD. And I have to actually find the physical CD I want - which really isn't easy. I think I may have to pretend I haven't been mocking people with alphabetically indexed CD collections for years, and sort my own out...
(mp3s at home really aren't that practical, for various reasons)
This means that instead of the nice, big, fat mp3 collection which lives on my work hard drive, I'm actually having to listen to, like, CDs. And I have to get up and walk across the room when I want to change CD. And I have to actually find the physical CD I want - which really isn't easy. I think I may have to pretend I haven't been mocking people with alphabetically indexed CD collections for years, and sort my own out...
(mp3s at home really aren't that practical, for various reasons)
no subject
I also claim it's less sad than alphabetical ! <grin>
no subject
Date: 2003-11-28 06:33 am (UTC)I did try to group things approximately together a while back, but the categories were too broad and it didn't really help.
Maybe I should sort them by spine colour - would be pretty, at least :)
no subject
Date: 2003-11-28 10:33 am (UTC)I use the "sort by style" option myself - baroque, classical, romantic, etc., then within that, chronologically by composer. This works for me but many people would probably not see the "natural beauty and elegance" of my solution. There's a shelf at the end reserved for "popular" stuff.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-28 08:35 am (UTC)Not only does this make things findable
s/only/even/ ; maybe by you, everyone else is screwed
I also claim it's less sad than alphabetical!
s/sad/scalable/ ; Oh ye of little CD collection.
OK, I admit it, my CD collection is alphabetised. And within each artist, it's sorted by date of release. And I'm not ashamed.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-28 08:57 am (UTC)And filing Bat out of Hell under L is technically correct, but looks bloody silly. I suspect that few people will admit to this problem.
And then you get the other annoyances like Madonna and Kylie.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-28 09:01 am (UTC)And filing Bat out of Hell under L is technically correct
No it isn't. "Meat" is not a given name, and "Loaf" is not a surname.
Madonna is in no sense an issue - most people don't even know her surname. I've a suspicion it begins with C, though.
Kylie is an issue if you make it one, but since she started her career as "Kylie Minogue" I don't think I'd be any more troubled by the indexing than I would be by the fact of owning one of her albums.
Debbie Blondy and Harborough I will concede is a difficult one.