Conspiracy theory checklist
Dec. 4th, 2002 12:26 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ventaI'm reading "The Search for the Grail", a book which could well contain a lot of rubbish.
So far, the checklist for conspiracy theory goes as follows:
Page 2 - First mention of King Arthur (since it's on the grail, I'm prepared to cut them a certain amount of slack there...)
Page 4 - first occurrence of the phrase "seems too close a comparison to be mere coincidence"
Page 4 - First mention of Kinghts Templar (Hurray!)
Page 7 - First citing of Geoffrey of Monmouth in support of a theory
Page 13 - First occurrence of 2 consecutive paragraphs blatantly contradicting each other (always a good sign, this)
Plus, of course, the usual crop of arguments ex silentia and leaps of deduction.
Looking good so far :)
So far, the checklist for conspiracy theory goes as follows:
Page 2 - First mention of King Arthur (since it's on the grail, I'm prepared to cut them a certain amount of slack there...)
Page 4 - first occurrence of the phrase "seems too close a comparison to be mere coincidence"
Page 4 - First mention of Kinghts Templar (Hurray!)
Page 7 - First citing of Geoffrey of Monmouth in support of a theory
Page 13 - First occurrence of 2 consecutive paragraphs blatantly contradicting each other (always a good sign, this)
Plus, of course, the usual crop of arguments ex silentia and leaps of deduction.
Looking good so far :)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2002-12-04 07:01 am (UTC)Baba for last orders tomorrow ?
(Anyone else Oxford-based reading this ? Fancy meeting up for a drink ?)
Considering how today went...
Date: 2002-12-04 10:31 am (UTC)Blech. Bad mock exam.