Although IETF is a reasonably reputable place to look for RFCs, it seems only their version has the typos in. They go on to waffle about lients handling ultiple-byteranges. The much more sensible W3C (http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec4.html#sec4.4) disappointingly has the correct text.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-03 10:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-03 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-03 03:24 pm (UTC)