venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
A while ago, the mother (who reads the business pages and pays attention) mentioned in passing that Tesco was going to ditch its long-running Value brand. The red, white and blue packaging which saw me through my days as a poverty-stricken student was to be retired and something new (and as yet unspecified) was to take its place.

Now that I am no longer so poverty-stricken (or, for that matter, a student), and do a large chunk of my shopping in local independent shops, I actually buy remarkably little from the Tesco Value range. However, on my quick sprint through the supermarket yesterday I did spy that some products had got new outfits on. The value sparkling water (19p for 2 litres, if you're curious) now has a snazzy green label. Not only does it look a little more upmarket, it's now much more easily visually distinguished from the unfizzy kind (which I believe is blue).

The first value brand I ever remember encountering was the "Yellow Pack" range sold by the (now defunct) Fine Fare when I was a kid. The packaging was bright yellow, with stencilled-look lettering. It didn't actually say "War Deparment" on it, but seemed designed to appeal to a generation that remembered the post-war "Utility" goods. It was an aesthetic that was subsequently adopted by Kwik Save's "No Frills", and then by the chains which are still big players today. Plain labels, no pictures, very stark and very clearly marking itself out as a product which was not going to waste its customers' money on all that design nonsense, thank you very much.

Then, earlier in the year, Morrisson's abruptly raised the bar on value packaging. OK, so it was still clearly recognisable as a value brand, but suddenly the labels didn't seem to be designed to make the purchasers feel they were living in some weird alternative Soviet future. I remember idly speculating that this might prompt a bit of a re-brand elsewhere.

While searching yesterday for Tesco's own (not value) orange-squash-with-added-sugar-you-bastards[*] I happened to spot a shelf which had both old and new packaging on it. Compare and contrast:

Orange squash bottles showing old-style and new-style Tesco value branding

The "Everyday Value" label design seems to be the same on all products I've seen thus far, though the colour varies. It gives the products a consistent, branded feel whilst looking a little more upmarket than the old one. The labels are cheerful, and I like them.

Clearly we are in an age where we want our austerity to look a little less... austere.

[*] It seems to be increasingly difficult to find squash which doesn't cheerfully trumpet "No Added Sugar" at you. Which is a shame, because no-added-sugar squash is almost invariably vile. Tesco's own-brand squash comes in small or large bottles in every flavour - except no-added-sugar orange, which comes only in large bottles.

Date: 2012-05-02 08:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snow-leopard.livejournal.com
I HATE the profusion of "No added sugar" cordial as they invariably contain sweeteners and, with my IBS, I am allergic to sweeteners.
This means each supermarket trip involves reading pretty much every label in the cordial aisle to try and locate the ONE bottle that actually contains sugar!

Date: 2012-05-02 08:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Eep :( I don't have your sound reasons, I'm just a bit picky about my drinks! The squash selection in our house is the Tesco own-brand orange, which is ChrisC's preference of the many orangey brands he's tried, and Ocean Spray "Cranberry Classic" for me. You can only get the Tesco one in very large stores, and the cranberry one has turned into a ridiculous quest as most places only seem to stock the sickly cranberry-and-raspberry version. All Ocean Spray drinks proudly tell you on the label that they're free from articial sweeteners, hurray.

It certainly used to be the case that M&S's high-juice squashes were all sugar-only, but I don't know if it still is.

I imagine that the posher we're-cordial-not-squash products (eg Bottle Green) don't contain artificial sweeteners, but maybe that's wishful thinking?

Date: 2012-05-02 09:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
Call me a knit-your-own-yogurt hippy, but I don't much like either sugar or sweeteners in my fruit-based refreshing drink. I just water down fruit juice, about 1:4 in the case of orange.

Date: 2012-05-02 09:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
I wouldn't dream of accusing you of making your own muesli out of macrame. I also drink fruit juice, and usually water it down, but I'd regard that as a totally different drink. (And if, like me, you were drinking cranberry juice I think you probably do want sugar in it ;)

Date: 2012-05-02 09:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
Mm, I'm not sure I've ever had cranberry juice just as is. That might be a bit too refreshing.

Date: 2012-05-02 12:13 pm (UTC)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
From: [personal profile] lnr
That's not so much a problem with no-added-sugar ones though - those obviously contain sweetener. The problem is the fact that many *non*-diet drinks which *do* contains sugar *also* contain sweeteners, because they're cheap. Personally I think it's appalling, even though I'm a diet-drinker.

I'm glad to see that standard Ribena has no artificial sweeteners in - with Robinsons it looks like only their "Select" range is safe now.

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 26th, 2025 08:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios