Poor old soul, blimey what a joke
Feb. 8th, 2012 12:16 pmPublic Service Announcement, in case anyone else has been suffering vague confusion when reading film reviews of late:
The Arthur Kipps who features in The Woman In Black bears absolutely no relation to the Arthur Kipps who features in the HG Wells novel (subsequently adapated as Half a Sixpence).
I did wonder how I'd managed to watch a stage production of The Woman In Black without realising that the protagonist was a character I'd met in a book before. I didn't. He's a completely different character, written by a different author, 80 years later. He just has the same name.
The Arthur Kipps who features in The Woman In Black bears absolutely no relation to the Arthur Kipps who features in the HG Wells novel (subsequently adapated as Half a Sixpence).
I did wonder how I'd managed to watch a stage production of The Woman In Black without realising that the protagonist was a character I'd met in a book before. I didn't. He's a completely different character, written by a different author, 80 years later. He just has the same name.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-08 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-08 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-09 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-10 08:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-15 12:37 pm (UTC)I probably did better with set plays than books: I remember An Inspector Calls, Romeo and Juliet, Julius Caesar and Marlowe's Faust.
I think that unless you have at least some inclination towards being an English academic, then performing formal criticism on a work will enhance enjoyment of it to approximately the extent reading the source code would enhance your enjoyment of Pong, if you had no inclination towards programming.