And another thing...
From the Daily Mail:
Aware that News of the World staff might use their final edition to fire a parting shot at her, Rebekah Brooks is said to have instructed two senior executives to read the paper with a ‘fine toothcomb’.
Now, I don't know if that's the Daily Fail's error, or Rebekah Brooks' error. And it's not the first time I've seen it. But really, guys...
Do you comb your teeth? No.
So is it likely that a toothcomb is a thing? No.
It's a fine-tooth(ed) comb, you idiots.
From the Daily Mail:
Aware that News of the World staff might use their final edition to fire a parting shot at her, Rebekah Brooks is said to have instructed two senior executives to read the paper with a ‘fine toothcomb’.
Now, I don't know if that's the Daily Fail's error, or Rebekah Brooks' error. And it's not the first time I've seen it. But really, guys...
Do you comb your teeth? No.
So is it likely that a toothcomb is a thing? No.
It's a fine-tooth(ed) comb, you idiots.
I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that
Date: 2011-07-11 09:05 am (UTC)(Must be true, they said it on QI).
Re: I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that
Date: 2011-07-11 09:11 am (UTC)Although it turns out I'm wrong, and a toothcomb really is a thing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toothcomb).
Although, I imagine, not the thing that was meant.
Re: I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that
Date: 2011-07-11 09:17 am (UTC)Re: I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that
Date: 2011-07-11 09:21 am (UTC)Re: I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that
Date: 2011-07-11 09:31 am (UTC)Re: I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that
Date: 2011-07-11 09:41 am (UTC)Re: I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that
Date: 2011-07-11 01:32 pm (UTC)Re: I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that
Date: 2011-07-11 10:12 am (UTC)Re: I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that
Date: 2011-07-11 01:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 09:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 09:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 03:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 09:20 am (UTC)"Woman stares wildly at calamity" - DIsaster
(and I also love how the equating of Woman with Di carries on to the bitter end.)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/phone-hacking/8628690/News-of-the-World-final-crossword-has-a-message-for-catastrophe-Rebekah-Brooks.html
no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 09:53 am (UTC)This and this are quite interesting, although it doesn't seem to understand hyphens. Strange that the -ed version doesn't seem to be used at all in British.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 10:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-11 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 09:59 am (UTC)At least, that's what they said it was. I couldn't really make out much beyond a few slightly odd partings, but there were modern-day acryllic recreations and such to get the kids interested.
Of course, neolithic toothcombs were all handmade so not only non-comformant to modern point sizes, but also highly individual. Alledgedly it worked as a form of very basic security between comb-owners but that sounds a bit like an academic's flight of fancy to me.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 10:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 10:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-12 02:19 pm (UTC)That's some fine napping. Not sure I can think of a more difficult material to try to work into a comb than flint.
Well, OK I can: Jelly. But that would just get silly... and they didn't have it in neoliffic times.