venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
I have an enquiry of a delicate nature.

I'm having difficulty finding bras which I like. At some point in the last few years, the fashion industry declared that if you are any smaller than a DD, you'll be wanting to conceal this dangerous information with a bra which is padded, shaped, and various other things.

If you go somewhere cheap and nasty like Primark, every single bra available A-C will have impressive cleavage all by itself, without even a person in it. It's terrifying. If you go somewhere posh and pricey... well, it's a little better. But even then the unpadded bras will be embroidered, beaded, be-ribboned and generally all a bit much. Most stages between Primark and posh seem similarly afflicted.

A few places will have, tucked away at the back, a small display of boxed, cheap, dead-plain bras. They won't be execiting, or available in anything other than white, but they will be functional. Interestingly, the mother reports a recent haul from this department of M&S included a bra which (in very small print) had the warning "do not wear for more than 8 hours". We could only deduce it was due to the non-slip coating on the inside of the straps, which was akin to the odd rubbery stuff they put on hold-ups. Which, incidentally, doesn't work; but I digress.

So I turn to you, the bra-wearing section of the LJ-reading public, to help out. Where can I find "nice" underwear, preferably the sort for which one can buy matching pants, which isn't padded? I'm happy with underwiring, I just don't require gel-filled, air-filled or anything-else-filled enhancement. (Except, of course, according to the underwear-making world I do require it. I just don't want it.)

I'd prefer a real live shop, as buying things which need to fit well online is a bit of a gamble.

Date: 2011-02-23 12:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ar-gemlad.livejournal.com
Purely in the interests of science, I enclose a link to see if this comment gets screened.

Date: 2011-02-23 12:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ar-gemlad.livejournal.com
And it wasn't. Inconclusive result! (I'll stop spamming your comments now)

Date: 2011-02-23 12:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
No problem, I'm curious!

I also wonder that my test (below) was invalid, since presumably I wouldn't spam my own journal.

I wonder that the difference might be that I don't list [livejournal.com profile] paste as a friend (which is news to me!)

Date: 2011-02-23 12:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
It did not. I enclose a more promotional-looking one for further testing:

Why not buy Nike trainers (http://www.nike.com/nikeos/p/nike/language_select/)?

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
2223 2425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 07:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios