venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
Bah. Occasionally I see photos and think wow, yes, I should take more pictures. Hey, maybe if I worked at it I could do great things like those!

Then every so often I see a photo which makes me think hell, no, I have the photographic ability of a gnat, other people can make these transcendental images and I might as well give up right now.

This is one of the latter kind.

Wow.

Date: 2010-12-16 05:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Pretty!

Although I contend that unless you try taking images like that you can't complain about not managing. When was the last time you were up on a roof with a camera and tripod?

Date: 2010-12-16 10:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] d-floorlandmine.livejournal.com
Aye. Also, that time on the roof should probably be followed by some work with some digital processing - that looks like an HDR image, and the fact that there's stationary traffic visible suggests that it was HDR made from a single RAW file ...

With a shot like that, photographic ability is only part of it. Ability to do the post-processing is another. And getting access to the roof is another.

Date: 2010-12-17 09:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Admittedly, I haven't been up on a roof with a camera/tripod in ages.

The trouble, as Mr Landmine so rightly says, is in the post-processing. Firstly, I shoot film, which is good in some ways but bad in others. Secondly, some time ago I saw a few examples or photos which, in the raw[*] state, weren't that great but looked fab after people had done incomprehensible things to them in their photo-editing package of choice.

I don't know anything about the post-processing and, though I presume I could learn, I don't have an awful lot of interest in it as it always feels like cheating. However... I simply won't be able to achieve the results I want without learning this stuff... and I've kind of stuck there.

[*] Not RAW, just as they were.

Date: 2010-12-17 09:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
I've got the opposite problem - digital image work isn't a problem, but I very seldom take any really good photos.

Date: 2010-12-17 10:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Together we can take the art world by storm!

(Not that I necessarily take really good photos either, but I'm much more willing to work on that bit :)

Date: 2010-12-17 10:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Phew, for a moment there I thought you were going to say we fight crime! (Which I'm not really up for, particularly in this weather.)

Date: 2010-12-17 03:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] d-floorlandmine.livejournal.com
particularly in this weather
Good call. Crime-fighting is another fair-weather activity. [grin]

Date: 2010-12-17 03:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] d-floorlandmine.livejournal.com
I try not to do much post-processing - and when I do, it's pretty obvious. Although I am finding that I am doing more, especially with portraits. And if you're doing some, it's easy to just tweak the levels a bit, to darken the shadows properly, and to lighten the highlights ... and it's then a slippery slope until you're doing full HDR shots ... [grin]

Date: 2010-12-16 05:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fractalgeek.livejournal.com
That is very fine indeed.

Intrigued by the article with it. The work on the building it was taken from looks much more like renovation, rather than demolition.

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 06:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios