I've noticed, of late, that I've been getting worse at filling in captchas correctly. I think that they're getting worse, and harder to read - but possibly this is just the equivalent of declaring as you get older than all your friends have started mumbling.
This was today's particularly troublesome specimen:

Is it just me, or is the second word hard to read, and the last letter just a splodge?
Is captcha-reading software getting better, forcing captchas to become ever more illegible?
Or am I, in fact, slowly devolving into a spam bot?
This was today's particularly troublesome specimen:

Is it just me, or is the second word hard to read, and the last letter just a splodge?
Is captcha-reading software getting better, forcing captchas to become ever more illegible?
Or am I, in fact, slowly devolving into a spam bot?
no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:13 am (UTC)However, a little testing has just revealed that the wretched site behaves identically if you *don't* type the correct words in (though presumably doesn't actually enter you into the competition). So I've no idea what it should have been.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:22 am (UTC)they take the most common suggestion and use that as the OCR word. reCaptchas are a little forgiving anyway.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:26 am (UTC)Even the "?" text (which I've never read before, because I assumed it was the usual patronising "what is this?" text rather than an explanation of a thing I didn't even realise was happening) doesn't actually tell you about the first word/second word difference.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:11 am (UTC)Is my theory, anyway.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-10 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:16 am (UTC)Glorified?
As I said below, I thought (possibly completely wrongly) that I was explicitly looking for something which was not an actual word. If I'd been looking for something approximating a word, glorified would have been my guess.
(Buggered if I know what I'd have gone with for the first word, though, as AFAIK saltord isn't actually a real word.)
no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:12 am (UTC)I think the reCAPTCHA ones are particularly bad for this, as they're apparently deliberately using words that already failed OCR - harder for bots yes, but there doesn't seem to have been any thought into *why* they failed, and the fact that some of them are just impossible out of context.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:14 am (UTC)Y'see, I was under the impression that captchas usually used non-words, so automatically ruled out anything which was, like, actually a word :(
no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:30 am (UTC)The third letter could be any of o, e, a or even u, the eighth letter ditto, and of the final smudge the less said the better...)
no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 11:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 05:45 pm (UTC)See most of the other comments, the second one probably is a word! (And hence probably is "glorified".)
no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 12:16 pm (UTC)Je ne suis pas un bot!
no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 12:26 pm (UTC)At least you didn't get one of these!
no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 02:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 05:14 pm (UTC)Reading bad handwriting/poor printing/wonky computer-deying letters is way easier if all you have to do is spot a known word.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-08 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-15 10:04 pm (UTC)