venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
It's Friday, it's about 3 o'clock. It's time to go underneath the covers (with the lights out).

I always recommend listening to a cover version without knowing what or who it is, so click on the link before reading ahead...

Today's cover version [link to mp3 expired]

That was the Elvis Costello covering What Do I Do Now, originally by Sleeper.

This is the first appearance of a guest cover: it's one suggested by [livejournal.com profile] phlebas, and comes from issue 17 of the now sadly defunct Volume magazine (an issue our household doesn't have on its shelves).

My ideas of Sleeper remain (sadly) coloured by the immense disappointment of seeing them live, but even allowing for that, I think this is a pretty bland song. Costello's cover of it somehow lends it a bit of gravitas and makes it sound rather less banal and more interesting.

Although, as my friend Jamie put it: "I find the thought of the man who referred to his contemporaneous lyricists as 'pygmies' doing a Sleeper cover quite amusing" :)

Date: 2010-08-13 03:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Yes. It really, really, is.

Or, rather, it isn't because Ellie whatsherface is only about 11.

But still. I mean. It's like the 90s never happened.

Date: 2010-08-13 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Yes. It really, really, is.

Must surely be deliberate? I think it's that using-Hammond-organ-as-percussion thing that does it.

Date: 2010-08-13 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Oh, yes, I think it's completely deliberate. Have you missed that we're having an 80s revival :)

Date: 2010-08-13 03:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
I did miss it, since a fair bit of the 80s never came off my stereo in the first place...

Although if you guys are having a Kajagoogoo revival - which is what it sounds like - then I might leave you to it!

Date: 2010-08-13 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
Mm, I think La Roux is the unacceptable face of the 80s revival, although they seems to be very popular for some reason.

(Also, surely it should be La Rousse. Or Le Roux. But not La Roux.)

Date: 2010-08-13 03:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Grammar wasn't very 80s.

Date: 2010-08-13 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
I didn't mean we personally :)

I heard La Roux doing an acoustic version of one of their own songs on last year's Glasto coverage and thought it was fantastic - sadly everything else of theirs appears to be a bit disappointing.

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 06:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios