venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
A couple of times recently I've mentioned http://www.theyworkforyou.com, and been surprised at the number of people who don't know about it. It's dead simple: type your postcode in, and get a random bunch of information (eg voting record on big issues, attendance record, links to speeches, contact details) for your MP.

All right, admittedly the internet is for porn but the next thing it should be for is this.

Pushing information around - and sorting the relevant bits of information out of huge stacks - it what computers and the internet are good at. I am aware that they need a bit of help, and there's a big crowd of volunteers and (these days) paid people behind TheyWorkForYou pushing stuff into databases so my searches can pull it out again.

Via TheyWorkForYou, I also found a system whereby you can ask to be emailed when your MP speaks in Parliament. There are also handy interfaces to find what's been said on topics that interest you. This information has, of course, always been available but only to someone with the time and patience to ferret through Hansard. Speaking strictly for myself, I have no idea how one gets one's paws on those printed transcripts and have never bothered. But online and searchable? Bring it on.

For all our current government's blathering about the need for reform, and for stricter rules, I feel that this is where MP's accountability is going to come from. People like me - who, with the best will in the world, I wouldn't describe as politically active - keeping an eye on what the person I've democratically elected[*] to look after my interests is up to. Does what they say match up with what they do ? Are they ever actually showing up to vote on things I care about ? Are they, in fact, looking after my interests ? It's almost enough to make me feel enthusiastic about the election.

Even better, people with the time and inclination are grabbing the information available and putting it out in handily digestible formats. Having recently bestirred myself to write to my MP to ask for action on the Digital Economy Bill and had a reply via minion of his stating that:

There are undeniably some good points to this Bill but there are several aspects which give me severe misgivings and concerns. I think it is ridiculous to take this before the House for one day's debate as this would allow insufficient scrutiny and I think this would be best returned to the House by the next Government.

... I feel I can now be justifiably grumpy that he didn't actually go along to the debate yesterday. How do I know this? Because some nice person has created http://www.didmympshowupornot.com to answer just that question.

[*] As a point of order: as you may know, I moved about 6 months ago. So I didn't actually democratically elect my current MP. Judging by his record on TheyWorkForYou, he's an idiot. He's not only on what a colleague of mine refers to as the idiot list, he's one of the people who organised it.

Date: 2010-04-07 05:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lanfykins.livejournal.com
Mine apparently didn't show up either. But then, I wasn't going to vote for him anyway :)

Date: 2010-04-07 05:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Unfortunately my MP is this guy, so what I really need is a site that helps me pretend he doesn't exist.

Date: 2010-04-07 05:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bopeepsheep.livejournal.com
You poor thing. Not only him but my Mad AuntTM is one of your local councillors. (Nothing to do with me, guv.)

Date: 2010-04-07 05:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
On the plus side I never actually meet these people face to face since this area's so blue they don't even need to get out of bed to win the seat.

Date: 2010-04-07 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bopeepsheep.livejournal.com
I was quite surprised to find out she was a Conservative - it doesn't fit with her upbringing or what I remember of her personal politics at all. I suspect her of joining the party most likely to get her elected, IYSWIM.

I admit to not really thinking of the area as particularly prone to Toryism (it reminds me of East Oxford, which is firmly NOT Tory) but then I last lived there in 1991...

Date: 2010-04-07 05:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
The basic problem is that it's now a wealthy enough area that the subset of the electorate who vote entirely in line with their own interests are pretty much all going to vote Tory.

Date: 2010-04-07 06:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] exspelunca.livejournal.com
More power to these sites. When your MP makes McCavity look high-profile, both in the constituency and in Westminster, you know exactly why his party is, this time, fielding an "I live here, I'll be around, I'll work for you" candidate. But now we can check!

Date: 2010-04-07 07:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.com
See also yournextmp.com, containing candidates for the general election.

If you volunteer to wander the internet looking for missing candidate details, you might win a duck house :) though you do have to visit the BNP's website occasionally. But they rarely have contact details online so it's generally a waste of time.

Date: 2010-04-07 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undyingking.livejournal.com
Mm, and the associated http://www.democracyclub.org.uk/

It'll be interesting to see if the hordes of people who've suddenly discovered the existence of democracy, under threat of having their internet cut off by the DEB, will take that forward into monitoring MPs' accountability on other issues.

Date: 2010-04-08 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] onebyone.livejournal.com
It might not be fair to call that the idiot list. It's almost certainly dumb for example to regret that the committee ignored 74 trials that presumably were cherry-picked (I'm pretty certain there have been more than 74 trials on homeopathy, everywhere, ever). But look at the list of signers: Frank Field, Glenda Jackson, Bob Marshall-Andrews, Diane Abbot, Harry Cohen, Stephen Pound. That's the "What are we rebelling against? What have you got?" crowd. Maybe it wasn't a very good committee report.

Anyway, there are a lot more idiots than you think, including militant Labour and 40 of 63 Lib Dems: http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=33006&SESSION=885

Date: 2010-04-08 03:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] onebyone.livejournal.com
Btw, are that colleague's initials SG?

Date: 2010-04-08 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Might be ;)

Date: 2010-04-08 04:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Anyway, there are a lot more idiots than you think

Don't worry, he signed that one too (Stephen Pound is my MP).

Date: 2010-04-08 04:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] onebyone.livejournal.com
If he's genuinely pro-homeopathy, that might explain why his mates all keep voting for those EDMs...

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 26th, 2025 11:27 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios