Well, if the Metro can have a regular feature based on what some bloke saw on the telly last night, I don't see why I can't join in...
One of the many allegations thrown at Ashley Cole today is that he sent a model "explicit sex text pictures". Much as I love the idea of a footballer sitting around painstakingly hand-crafting ASCII porn to send to his extra-marital encounters, I fear that may not have been what they meant.
In an unrelated news item, we are warned that a form of malware known as a rootkit could turn "your iPhone into a spy-phone". Apparently such malware could "turn on tracking GPS, send confidential datta or even drain the battery without the owner's knowledge". Oh noes! Not only might it broadcast personal data everywhere, worse it might drain the battery!
Also, a question: can you still call a child-carer a nanny if it's a bloke? The front page teaser for the rather unpleasant story about the child crushed by falling lamppost in Chiswick describes him as being pushed in a pram by "his nanny". The story then refers to "a male carer" in charge of the child being uninjured.
I'm not criticising the Metro for that one, I'm just curious.
One of the many allegations thrown at Ashley Cole today is that he sent a model "explicit sex text pictures". Much as I love the idea of a footballer sitting around painstakingly hand-crafting ASCII porn to send to his extra-marital encounters, I fear that may not have been what they meant.
In an unrelated news item, we are warned that a form of malware known as a rootkit could turn "your iPhone into a spy-phone". Apparently such malware could "turn on tracking GPS, send confidential datta or even drain the battery without the owner's knowledge". Oh noes! Not only might it broadcast personal data everywhere, worse it might drain the battery!
Also, a question: can you still call a child-carer a nanny if it's a bloke? The front page teaser for the rather unpleasant story about the child crushed by falling lamppost in Chiswick describes him as being pushed in a pram by "his nanny". The story then refers to "a male carer" in charge of the child being uninjured.
I'm not criticising the Metro for that one, I'm just curious.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-24 09:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-24 09:54 am (UTC)I have no words for how vomitously twee and patronising I find this. Not as bad as 'yummy mummy', I guess.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-24 10:08 am (UTC)I have no problem with a male nanny - I'm not sure what else they would be called. A carer or childminder sounds like something a bit different.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-24 12:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-02-24 01:20 pm (UTC)The news media seems to have gone a bit Christian today. Big headline on the Metro this morning "Chancellor: No.10 unleashed forces of hell against me". Gordon Brown was on GMTV this morning, presumably to deny any links with SATAN, and I'm fully expecting his wife to be on Newsnight to tell us that Gordon goes to church every Sunday.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-24 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-24 09:38 pm (UTC)That made me laugh. I considered sending it to a work colleague who would similarly spot that mistake, but eventually decided against on context grounds.