venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
I'm surprised there hasn't been more fuss over this. Maybe I've just missed it.

There are (though not nearly as many as I'd expect) reports online that a company is setting up a Directory Enquiries equivalent for mobile numbers. So (in theory) you call them, and for £1 they'll connect you to (rather than give you the number for)[**] anyone you ask them for.

The provenance of the numbers they're using is a little dicey - "generally [they are] from companies who collect mobile telephone numbers from customers in the course of doing business and have been given permission by the customers to share those numbers". In theory, if you always check[*] that box this won't affect you at all.

It's possible to make yourself ex-directory by texting 'E' to 118800, though early and "unscientific" testing from The Register suggests that the directory is far from exhaustive.

You can read about the directory from the horse's mouth here.

Update: You can check here if you're in the directory. A prize to the first person who can actually find themselves (or indeed anyone they know) in it...

[*] or do I mean uncheck ? I can't remember offhand whether it's opt-in or opt-out.
[**] That's what reports say. The horse's mouth says that they'll sms the person you're trying to contact with your details.

Date: 2009-06-11 09:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bopeepsheep.livejournal.com
Customer relations: implying that your customer is a dribbling loon who cannot type straight is not encouraged. Much better to suggest they merely have another go in case Magic has happened...

Date: 2009-06-11 09:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Customer relations with geeks: implying your customer believes in Magic is not encouraged. Much better to suggest a typing error...

:)

I'm sure you're right, though.

Date: 2009-06-11 09:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bopeepsheep.livejournal.com
I suspect the target market for this service is not geeks, hence belief in Magic creeping towards acceptable. :)

Date: 2009-06-11 11:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Much better to suggest a typing error

Maybe their best option is to insert "[PEBCAK?]" below the other suggestions. The non-geeks will just ignore it!

Date: 2009-06-11 11:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
I didn't know the acronym, so had to look it up. Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebkac) says (among other things):

"The phrase is used by computer experts as a humorous[2] way to describe user errors."

I love the fact they've included a citation to demonstrate that it is, indeed, humorous :)

Date: 2009-06-11 11:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Wikipedia: perfect bibliography if and only if it's absolutely not necessary.

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 26th, 2025 10:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios