Erase my life like a car crash, baby
Nov. 7th, 2008 09:27 amYesterday I was driving along the A4074 at exactly 50mph (which is dead on the speed limit). One of those speed-sensing signs lit up as I approached, warning me of oncoming bends and the need to slow down.
The section of road I was driving along is far from Roman, and is affectionately known as "The Thirteen Bends of Death". It's a dangerous road, by which I mean it's a perfectly safe bit of rural English road along which people drive with such monumental twattery that it has an extremely high casualty rate. Sadly, they themselves are not always the ones injured or killed.
However, I know from driving along that bit for years that you don't need to drop below 50 to go round most of the bends safely. There's one - some distance after the sign - where your car will stay on the road perfectly happily at 50, but you probably want to drop speed a bit to make sure you can see what's coming and check you aren't about to collide with a hay wagon struggling up the hill at 15mph.
To me, the flashing sign suggests I'm going dangerously fast and need the warning when actually, I don't think I am. Similarly, around the motorway interchanges of the M4 and M40 with the M25 there are plenty of signs saying "max speed 40" round bends which can safely be taken at considerably more. Even by HGVs.
All this leads to one thing: you see a max speed warning, and don't take it seriously. Sure, you may drop speed a little but not to the "ridiculously" low speed they recommend. Then you drive across the moors to Whitby, pass the Legendary Saltersgate Inn (currently covered in scaffolding) see the sign warning you to take the next bend at 20mph... and don't realise that it means you should take the next bend at 20mph.
Pretty much everyone I've observed driving along that road has - the first time they encountered it - misjudged that bend. The crash barrier which stops you plummeting off the edge of the hill is regularly dented, scraped, or ripped completely away. All because people are conditioned to be blasé about warning signs.
Unless N Yorkshire follows the same approach everyone else does, and changes the recommended speed to 5mph (or adds a second sign saying "We really mean it!"), people are going to go on ignoring the sign. See also the layers of tyre left behind on the slip-road into London Gateway services, where people thought the 15mph warning was exaggerating.
I understand that a car's ability to corner varies wildly, and that an artic must go slower than a sportscar. But a little consistency in the speed recommendations would help enormously.
Does anyone know what my subject line is ? I can't place it. Deathboy ? Katscan ?
The section of road I was driving along is far from Roman, and is affectionately known as "The Thirteen Bends of Death". It's a dangerous road, by which I mean it's a perfectly safe bit of rural English road along which people drive with such monumental twattery that it has an extremely high casualty rate. Sadly, they themselves are not always the ones injured or killed.
However, I know from driving along that bit for years that you don't need to drop below 50 to go round most of the bends safely. There's one - some distance after the sign - where your car will stay on the road perfectly happily at 50, but you probably want to drop speed a bit to make sure you can see what's coming and check you aren't about to collide with a hay wagon struggling up the hill at 15mph.
To me, the flashing sign suggests I'm going dangerously fast and need the warning when actually, I don't think I am. Similarly, around the motorway interchanges of the M4 and M40 with the M25 there are plenty of signs saying "max speed 40" round bends which can safely be taken at considerably more. Even by HGVs.
All this leads to one thing: you see a max speed warning, and don't take it seriously. Sure, you may drop speed a little but not to the "ridiculously" low speed they recommend. Then you drive across the moors to Whitby, pass the Legendary Saltersgate Inn (currently covered in scaffolding) see the sign warning you to take the next bend at 20mph... and don't realise that it means you should take the next bend at 20mph.
Pretty much everyone I've observed driving along that road has - the first time they encountered it - misjudged that bend. The crash barrier which stops you plummeting off the edge of the hill is regularly dented, scraped, or ripped completely away. All because people are conditioned to be blasé about warning signs.
Unless N Yorkshire follows the same approach everyone else does, and changes the recommended speed to 5mph (or adds a second sign saying "We really mean it!"), people are going to go on ignoring the sign. See also the layers of tyre left behind on the slip-road into London Gateway services, where people thought the 15mph warning was exaggerating.
I understand that a car's ability to corner varies wildly, and that an artic must go slower than a sportscar. But a little consistency in the speed recommendations would help enormously.
Does anyone know what my subject line is ? I can't place it. Deathboy ? Katscan ?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 10:19 am (UTC)I'm actually a big fan of the flashing sign approach, because on the rare occasions when I am speeding it's usually because it simply hasn't occurred to me that I might be (going down gentle hills, for example). But I do wish they'd calibrate them slightly above the limit to remove false positives. There's one sign in a 30 zone in Ashford which regularly flashes me at closer to 25, making it worse than useless.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 10:36 am (UTC):)
no subject
Win!Fail!no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 10:30 am (UTC)Edit: blimey, I can't type today.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 10:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 10:46 am (UTC)Everyone does!
In fairness to the A4074, it's not just a case of getting round the bends without falling off the road. You need to be aware of the possibilities of slow-moving agricultural traffic, cyclists struggling up hills, even pedestrians (who are braver than I am) - all of which are more possible than the road would lead you to expect. However, driving with care is a slightly different thing from slowing down.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 10:50 am (UTC)I discovered a similar thing driving in Wales, where this:
doesn't mean "Bend to right (or left if symbol reversed)1", it means "Slow the fuck down, a sheep would have trouble getting round this bastard!"
--
[1] - In real terms, this usually means "The road curves a bit"2
[2] - For American drivers; "Warning, driver intervention required!"
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 10:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 11:19 am (UTC)There's odd bits of the East Riding where it's relevant too.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 11:59 am (UTC)I vote for this!
:)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 12:32 pm (UTC)Which I know from liking the bit that opens the second part, thinking it was the start of a song, and then taking a while to skim through the intros of all the Deathboy tracks that I have, unable to find it.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 12:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 01:18 pm (UTC)I completely agree re those signs. 99% of them are needless nannying, which means the 1% that isn't really catches you out.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 04:38 pm (UTC)Got another in the village where I work that goes down from 60 to 30 and they have a flashing 30 sign about 40yards afterwards, but its right before a roundabout so people are slowing down for that anyway and it still flashes at you!
I don't mind it though, its not like its hindering my journey or making my life difficult, my only thoughts are that they better be solar powered, I would hate to think they had a sign flashing 2000 times a day using the national grid when a simple old fashioned metal sign would have done the trick. But thats the part-eco-nut in me.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-08 04:45 am (UTC)I can only assume the general policy of over-warning on English roads causes the emmets to be blase about road safety in general.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-09 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-09 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 02:33 pm (UTC)