So, sums. I can, broadly speaking, do sums. I have a degree in maths.
However, interest rate calculations have always baffled me. Sure, if you ask me to calculate 3 months compound interest at a monthly rate of x% I know what to do. However, when it comes to real examples of mortgages and credit cards, I can't work out what the sum I need to do is. I'm still slightly baffled about the interest charged me when I was a day late paying my credit card off in full in March.
Today, the BBC carried a story about a loanshark. It includes the following statement about someone who borrowed £1000:
"...to pay £49 a week over 60 weeks, making the total amount he had to
repay £2,940 at 917% APR."
Now, if we approximate 60 weeks to a year, then surely that's an annual interest rate of no more than 294%. The quoted APR isn't even in vaguely the right ballpark.
So... have I completely failed to understand APR ? (Wikipedia's page on the subject didn't really help with the definition.) Or is the BBC publishing unmitigated wank in the name of investigative journalism ?
Edit It turns out I'd failed to understand APR, and the BBC is cleared in this instance.
However, interest rate calculations have always baffled me. Sure, if you ask me to calculate 3 months compound interest at a monthly rate of x% I know what to do. However, when it comes to real examples of mortgages and credit cards, I can't work out what the sum I need to do is. I'm still slightly baffled about the interest charged me when I was a day late paying my credit card off in full in March.
Today, the BBC carried a story about a loanshark. It includes the following statement about someone who borrowed £1000:
"...to pay £49 a week over 60 weeks, making the total amount he had to
repay £2,940 at 917% APR."
Now, if we approximate 60 weeks to a year, then surely that's an annual interest rate of no more than 294%. The quoted APR isn't even in vaguely the right ballpark.
So... have I completely failed to understand APR ? (Wikipedia's page on the subject didn't really help with the definition.) Or is the BBC publishing unmitigated wank in the name of investigative journalism ?
Edit It turns out I'd failed to understand APR, and the BBC is cleared in this instance.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-29 04:33 pm (UTC)The LJ Addons extension includes links to unfold thread by thread without having to reload the page, if that's any help...
no subject
Date: 2008-07-29 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-29 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 03:38 pm (UTC)Oh, and comments in chronological order can be accessed without the browser addon by tacking "?view=flat" on to the URL, but I usually find the lack of context for each comment in this mode makes it very difficult to read.
(Here because I seem to have coincidentally asked the same question (http://imc.livejournal.com/185389.html?style=mine) on my journal and was directed to this thread. And my UK mobile number is 7 times a prime while my home number is 2*3*5 times a prime.)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 03:49 pm (UTC)(Do I know you, btw? -- you seem to know several of my friends, and to have been around Oxford while I was there.)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-04 09:44 am (UTC)