I have just received the weirdest LJ comment I've ever seen. It's on this thread:
http://venta.livejournal.com/269155.html
It looks like the sort of cobbled-together bilge that might feature in the body of spam email to try and fool Bayesian filters, but I'm baffled as to what it's doing on my LJ.
http://venta.livejournal.com/269155.html
It looks like the sort of cobbled-together bilge that might feature in the body of spam email to try and fool Bayesian filters, but I'm baffled as to what it's doing on my LJ.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-24 09:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-24 09:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-24 09:52 am (UTC)Here (now with correct link!)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-24 09:57 am (UTC)Or maybe he wound up a spider/robot and set it spamming people for him.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-24 10:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-24 10:00 am (UTC)He seems to have veered off from complaining about use of the name, and just gone for generalised ranting.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-24 10:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-24 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-24 12:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-24 01:22 pm (UTC)My knowledge of IP address diganostics is limited, though - having tried whois and dig I'm out of options.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-24 09:08 pm (UTC)Looks like a few people on my flist got rubbish from the M1n15try of Dr34m5 chap today. I had rather hoped he had drowned in his own lunatic bile by now, but sadly it appears not.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-25 08:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-24 10:09 pm (UTC)I never said it was a good theory, mind.