Like a dog returneth to its vomit...
Jul. 16th, 2007 11:14 pmA month ago, I wrote here about the demise of the company I'd worked for since leaving university.
I went through the signing-on pantomime, I looked through job adverts. I polished my CV and sent it to people.
Who almost all ignored me.
A couple of weeks back, I agreed to work for a new start-up company. It hadn't an office, or any equipment. I've been working at home for the past ten days or so, and today I went into the hastily-acquired but tiny office space. Which still doesn't have any equipment - like, say, computers - in it. I already know my immediate boss; it's the same guy who was my boss at the previous company. Similarly, the CEO making the introductory speech looked strangely familiar. In fact... all the people piled into the room were ex-colleagues. The office is - with a bit of imagination and a big lever - a stone's throw from our old building.
A handful of people - some management and some engineers - have somehow brought an entire new company into being in slightly under five weeks. It's not a carbon-copy of the old one, though it's working in the same area of technology.
So, the good news: I am employed again, working with people I know and like for a company which sounds exciting. The bad news: I'm back to the grind of two hours' commuting every day. Oh, and I drew the short straw: the stuff I was working on at the old company is not currently required, and our former documentation guy has taken a contract elsewhere. Being literate, pedantic and inclined to whinge about documentation standards I am temporarily seconded to the life of a technical author.
Of the people on the books of my previous employer when the ship went down, fewer than 10% have not elected to climb aboard the new vessel. As yet, I'm unsure whether this demonstrates amazing staff loyaly, or merely highlights what an amazingly slack bunch we were when it came to finding new jobs.
Edit When I posted this, the formatting went all to pot and I had to manually add <p> tags to make it sensible. So apologies if it gets very spacey when whatever glitch it was recovers.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-16 11:29 pm (UTC)Cathy xxx
no subject
Date: 2007-07-16 11:30 pm (UTC)Aardvark ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 10:14 pm (UTC)Hagbard ?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 10:20 pm (UTC)Check the housemates...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 10:24 pm (UTC)('Scuse the poor grammar in that.)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-18 09:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 05:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 06:35 am (UTC)Money!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 08:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 06:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 08:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 08:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 09:13 am (UTC)I'm currently investigating DocBook, which seems like a good plan.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 09:38 am (UTC)Take a look at www.author-it.com, Framemaker and Robohelp - those are all the main industry options beyond Word - the determining factor is really what delivery formats you need to deliver your doc in, and how many parallel formats you need. In a situation where you need more than one delivery format, AuthorIT wins (but it is a devil to configure with hidden traps everywhere. I can install, configure the AIT database, set up templates and internal AIT config and train you how to maintain it and extend it for your company on a consultancy basis if you decide to go down that path - its not trivial, and you will need help to get it up and running).
Give me a call this evening and I'll talk you through the pros and cons of each option.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 10:42 am (UTC)I should add, though, that I'm keen to receive no training and to make things as simple as possible just to make sure that I'm not seen as a future technical author - I'm out of there and straight back to programming as soon as I can reasonably get away with it. I definitely want as little money/resources as possible invested in me!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 11:15 am (UTC)That why we should talk, you'll save yourself a lot of pain in a few months time and the company a fair bit of money in the longer term if I can help you put the most flexible and appropriate doc solution in place up front.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 08:10 am (UTC)wah! -- hope it's not for too long. And good luck with everything.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 08:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 08:55 am (UTC)"Who almost all ignored me"
Date: 2007-07-17 09:14 am (UTC)Re: "Who almost all ignored me"
Date: 2007-07-17 09:16 am (UTC)Thanks for looking, though, and sorry to have caused you a wild goose chase.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-17 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-18 12:35 am (UTC)(he says, mysteriously .. )
no subject
Date: 2007-07-18 09:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-18 09:44 am (UTC)That didn't work last time, did it?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-19 11:03 am (UTC)<thinks>
"Real time embedded OS"... no, wait that's the last one.
"Sits about waiting to get some computers"... no, not tactful.
I haven't learnt the company song yet and thus don't have an answer ready to hand.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-19 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-02 11:47 pm (UTC)