Even after all this time, you can still send me a fax

[venta]

My apologies for the cryptic (or at least vague) nature of this post. I firmly believe that Christmas presents should be surprises and, while I don't really think the intended recipient of the present is all that likely to read this, I'm not taking any chances.

The other day we were chatting in the pub about something, and a question (hereafter known as "The Question") was raised. No one could answer it. A day or two later it occurred to me that if I could answer The Question, I'd have a fine idea for a Christmas gift (hereafter known as "The Present") for a friend.

Google and I had a very brief chat on the subject. Google said it was sorry, but it was utterly unable to answer The Question. Ah well, I thought. Never mind. I'll file it away as good idea in case I ever discover the answer.

Then I saw a BBC article, which was quite interesting in its own right, about how 82ask's question answerers work. 82ask is an sms-based question-answering service - you text a question to them, and they text the answer back; the only downside is that they charge you a quid for the privilege.

Cor, I thought. Let's give it a whirl. I've heard people dissing these services since it's effectively "paying someone else to google for you", but here was an occasion where google had failed. With a bit of poking and scrimping I managed to get The Question into 120 characters, and sent it off. Around ten minutes later, I received a reply requesting further details from me. I provided them as best I could, and another ten minutes later I received a second reply. The public-domain reference on my chosen topic was "fairly bare", and they couldn't help. I had not been charged.

Ah well, I thought. Never mind. As above.

Then it dawned on me. oxfordgirl introduced me to text-based question-answering over a year ago, but that was a different number. Minimal digging revealed that AQA, 82ask's rival, is still going strong. Hey, I thought, if I send the same question to AQA, the worst than can happen is that they don't know the answer either, and don't charge me.

I did that. Twenty minutes later they replied with a very detailed answer to The Question, and even supplied a URL at which I could buy The Present. Admittedly, their answer was framed cautiously "AQA thinks...". I ordered The Present. It arrived last week, and, lo and behold, is indeed exactly the right thing.

So, on my present summary of one attempt, AQA is way better than 82ask. Has anyone else ever used either of these ?

And does anyone else think that being a question-answerer would be a really fun job ? Incidentally, even armed with the answer, I still couldn't successfully locate a webpage which would have provided me with the detail I required.

Comments

[timeplease.livejournal.com]

And shortly afterwards: 82ASK: In English ales the common hops used in brewing is aroma hops (chosen for their aromatic qualities) and bittering hops (chosen for their bitter flavour).

So, full points to AQA for actually answering the question; nil points to 82ASK for sidestepping the question entirely!

[timeplease.livejournal.com]

After a followup query saying I was after varieties: 82ASK: Apologies, most commonly used variety hops are: Goldings, Challenger & Fuggles (main English hop developed in late 19th century). No charge.

So on the whole, both services are not bad!

[venta.livejournal.com]

But which was more correct - which hop is more common, Goldings or Fuggles ? I'd have thought Fuggles myself, but bow to your superior knowledge ;)

I have a question I want answered which I may try out on the pair of them. But not right now, as I'm going to sleep.