venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
OK, time for totting up the scores in the second Boggle game. This game was indeed much less popular than the former - and people entered much shorter word lists - making it a relatively simple matter to tot the scores up.

I originally said:

"A word is a legal word if (and only if) dictionary.com lists it as a word."

by which I meant "rules as before, but the dictionary whose word is final is dictionary.com".

However, one of the earliest entries was from [livejournal.com profile] addedentry, including words like "Etna". Which clearly wouldn't be allowed as it's a proper noun. However, it is listed by dictionary.com by a word, so I was left without, as they say, one of those lower limbs upon which to balance myself.

I had thought I'd expressly commented that things dictionary.com lists as "in Acronym Finder" weren't counted, but apparently I didn't, or I deleted it or something. I did stick to that, however: d.com has an entry for an acronym, but doesn't list it "as a word". Anything else, however - proper nouns, foreign words - was fair game.

In addition, considering the cock up I made up explaining my scoring system, I reckon the lesson we can all learn from this is that I can't specify games for toffee.

[livejournal.com profile] lanfykins: INTO, WELL, NEAL, TEW, AWM, WELE, WANE, FLYTE, LATEEN + 5 non-unique words
Total score: 12 - 5 = 7
[livejournal.com profile] addedentry: LEW, ETNA, FEAL, FETA, TEEL, WALM, LENTO + 4 non-unique words
Total score: 8 - 4 = 4
[livejournal.com profile] shyrdar: oaf, fan, let, ant, oaten + 3 non-unique words
Total score: 6 -3 = 3
[livejournal.com profile] nisaba: Flan, Ween, Leant, Wanty + 2 non-unique words
Total score: 6 - 2 = 4
[livejournal.com profile] pseudomonas: entered an empty list of words
Total score: 0
[livejournal.com profile] undyingking: EWE, WEN, YAT + 2 non-unique words
Total score: 3 - 2 = 1
[livejournal.com profile] wimble: ante, lei, leafy, fane, flay + 6 non-unique words
Total score = 6 - 6 = 0

Which leaves Lanfykins, who said "please don't list my score if it's embarrassing", as the winner on 7 points.

That means that the longest list of words (fourteen valid entries in dictionary.com) scored the highest, and the second longest list (eleven valid entries) scored the (joint) lowest. Game theorists make of that what you will :)

Date: 2006-01-11 01:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lanfykins.livejournal.com
I figured everyone would think that, which is why I listed the most obvious word I could find ;)

Date: 2006-01-11 02:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wimble.livejournal.com
The problem being that you're relying on everyone thinking that.

I was very tempted to submit all 70 odd words I'd dug out, on the grounds that 20 or so of them would hit the words that other people had used (scoring you -20, and me -20), but the other 50 would score me positive points (leaving me on +30, due to the sheer quantity of words, but you still on -20).

But again, if somebody else had adopted the same tactice, we'd have both ended up on -70.

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 10:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios