venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
This weekend, I was in Oxford. And the best thing about being in Oxford on the first Saturday of the month is that you can go to the secondhand record and CD fair in the Town Hall. For extra indie-cred, wave your antique IMSoc membership card at them and demand to be let in for half-price.

Then scour the boxes they hide under tables for hidden treasure. Two albums for a fiver ? Why, I don't mind if I do...

Aerosmith - Nine Lives : I make no apology for this. Shame Permanent Vacation was in the slightly more expensive box :)

Black Tape For A Blue Girl - : I have vague memories of having had this band recommended before. And they've got a good name. First impression of the album is positive overall, but I have a feeling it'll be one of those where I can never tell the tracks apart. Big, swooshy, dripping arcs of etheral melody; music to cry to. Sometimes the violins remind me a little bit of Ed Alleyne-Johnson's stuff.

Catchers - Stooping To Fit : OK. All right. I s'pose. Disappointing, really, because their other album, Mute might even make it into my top-ten-albums-ever. For some reason on Stooping To Fit they decided to ditch the haunting melodies, spare arrangements and fragile tunes and instead to sound a bit like every band, ever. Still, (a) I was warned to expect to be disappointed, and (b) it was a quid.

The Coral - The Coral : I thought I already owned a copy of this. Turns out I didn't, though. Must have mp3'd someone else's.

Devo - Smooth Noodle Maps : Note to self. Do not buy an album you have never heard of out of a bargain basement box. It may be in there for a reason. When I was 15, Q: Are We Not Men? A: We are DEVO! sounded like nothing else, and seemed wonderful. Catchy, quirky, and sometimes terribly serious and awkard. I've barely heard any Devo since. Smooth Noodle Maps is the last album they made before splitting up, sounds a bit like they'd been overrun by the Ghost of EBM Yet To Come, and does not, on one listen, appear to be a Good Thing. I'm hoping that (a) it might grow on me and (b) earlier Devo hasn't degraded and become rubbish while I wasn't listening.

In The Nursery - Duality : Having never seen any ITN albums secondhand before, I found two. By playing eeny-meeny, I chose Duality (the other was Anatomy of a Poet). Duality makes for rather pleasant listening - it occupies that strange halfway house between orchestral music and rock - but isn't at all what I was expecting. Where's the Big Drums ? Serves me right for completely ignoring the advice I was given.

Garbage - Version 2.0 : I think I had a taped copy of this at one point, but I've either lost it or recorded over it or something. It's certainly not new, but seeing Garbage recently reminded me that they've actually got a surprising number of good songs.

So, that's a neat half-BerWick (ie seven albums) for me.

Kind of. I'm keeping quiet about one other purchase. Coming soon to a Desk near you on a Friday afternoon.

Second hand CD shops are as much fun as secondhand bookshops. And that's not an accolade I bestow lightly.

Date: 2005-07-05 11:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Because none is required, I hope ?

Hmm. I do regard Aerosmith as inherently a little un-credible, and later albums especially so. Not that that means I don't enjoy it, just that I rather expect other people to take the piss when I do.

For all I'd say I've heard Nine Lives many times, it's always been in the background at parties and so on. I don't know it that well, and can't off-hand place Something's Gotta Give.

I'll get back to the apology question when I've listened to it a few more times.

Date: 2005-07-06 04:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
I do regard Aerosmith as inherently a little un-credible

Not without good reason, either. Mark and Lard (on Radio 1 a few years back) used to have a feature where they'd pick some particular current event in the world of entertainment and listeners would phone in suggestions for particularly appropriate tracks to play. The aim was primarily to get bad puns out of the track titles. Towards the end of the show they'd read out a top ten of suggestions, backwards from 10 to 1, finishing by playing track 1. On one occasion, every track of the top 10 was by Aerosmith. Good grief, I thought by about #3, are they really going to play an Aerosmith track ?!

But no, they weren't. They got to #1 then played something completely different.

The implication, though, was that they get a significant minority of requests for stuff like that. Their disinclination to actually play it being something of a vindication of your suspicions.

Date: 2005-07-06 07:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Yay, I remember the days of the Cheesily Cheerful Chart Challenge!

Mind you, I'd also have thought that, when they did that afternoon show, Mark and Lard were not given terribly free reign about what to play, and proper rock wasn't really within their remit.

Date: 2005-07-06 08:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Very likely true. Certainly some of the other Radio 1 shows have strongly hinted on the air that there are pretty strict limits on what they're allowed to play in terms of both genres and release dates.

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 30th, 2025 04:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios