venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
You know what ? I think it's time for a Silly Game.

OK, here's the rules. It's a game in three stages.

Stage 1

Post an anonymous comment here. Post an in-joke, or a shared memory, or a cryptic clue. Most importantly, it should be something that will allow me to identify you, whilst concealing your identity from anyone else. These comments will temporarily be screened (ie hidden from anyone other than me).

Stage 2

I'll unscreen (ie make visible) any anonymous comments. You are invited to guess who any of the commenters are - post your guesses as replies to the relevant comment. The guesses (including my own) will all be screened.

Stage 3

I'll unscreen all the guesses, and the original commenters are requested at this point to make themselves known.

Scores will then be calculated as follows:
For a guesser - 1 point for every correct guess, 0 for a wrong guess.
For a commenter - 1 point for every person who guessed you wrongly, 0 for everyone who guessed you correctly. Your score doubles if I guessed you correctly.
(You can, of course, be both a guesser and a commenter).

So... it's in the commenter's interest to make their comment (a) comprehensible to me, (b) sufficiently obscure that no one but me can guess who they are, but (c) sufficiently intriguing/interesting/tantalising that as many people as possible will try to guess.

Date: 2005-05-19 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Composting skip.

ECW

Date: 2005-05-19 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Ooh, I wasn't execting that! Lentils, 4!

Hullo, [livejournal.com profile] failmaster.

Liz/Venta

Re: ECW

Date: 2005-05-26 10:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] failmaster.livejournal.com
Hello. :)

Admittedly it wasn't hugely guessable, even by people who know me very well. In fact I can think of only one other person who'd get the reference! :)

Re: ECW

Date: 2005-05-26 10:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Well, it was (immediately) identified by me, and incorrectly guessed by several other people - which was exactly what was required. In fact, it probably gives you a wopping score of 4 or so, which might even make you the winner when I get round to calculating properly.

I can think of only one other person who'd get the reference!

Aye - he did :)

Re: ECW

Date: 2005-05-26 11:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] failmaster.livejournal.com
I'll confess to having not actually paid much attention to the whole game aspect of the... um... game, least of all how any hypothetical scoring system might work.

Date: 2005-05-19 08:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
That sounds domestic enough to be someone you've lived with, so I'll take a random guess at [livejournal.com profile] quisalan.

Date: 2005-05-24 10:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Er, can you show your working on that one !?

Date: 2005-05-25 08:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phlebas.livejournal.com
There was working?

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 29th, 2025 06:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios