![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Yeah, that's why I can never understand any of those silly letters you send me
I am easily entertained. This is not news. Just recently, I've actually been reading some of the spam that arrives at my old freeserve address.
I was curious about a mail whose subject line was "Do you crave to perceive valuable following morn ?". It turned out to be trying to interest me in hangover remedies (I think), and had presumably been translated by Babelfish after a bad night out:
"But our pills aids you avoid katzenjammers and wake sentient magnificent from head to abdomen and all over additional."
Wow! Now that very nearly made me follow the press-here-to-read-more. Dammit, I want to wake up feeling sentient magnficient from head to abdomen and all over additional. How could anyone resist ?
Mind you, that mail had assumed my name to be Fidelia Xaftlbe, which is not the sort of behaviour you want from someone making offers like that.
The latest volley of spam all seems to come from computer generated addresses, which have a proper 'name', but the part of the address before the @ sign is just a string of eight letters. Imagine my delight to be mailed by oocelotw! Not just an ocelot, but a computer-generated one! Disappointingly, it turned out not to be an ocelot at all, but an individual called Lena with poor sentence-construction and a habit of using "u" for "you". She thanked me for my mail and offered to send me a picture - generous, but disappointing when I'd been hoping for a big cat.
Today brings a mail from an Agatha - and you don't get many of those these days - telling me that "young and ruttish misses are waiting". While I fear that, if they are waiting for me, it may be a tediously long wait I am made extremely happy to see someone using the word ruttish. It is, perhaps, the kind of anachronistic and slightly coarse behavious one might expect from an Agatha.
However, I should make it clear that despite the number of offers in the past couple of weeks, I still don't want to buy a pre-owned Rolex watch. Especially not since I found my temporarily-mislaid Swatch this morning.
I was curious about a mail whose subject line was "Do you crave to perceive valuable following morn ?". It turned out to be trying to interest me in hangover remedies (I think), and had presumably been translated by Babelfish after a bad night out:
"But our pills aids you avoid katzenjammers and wake sentient magnificent from head to abdomen and all over additional."
Wow! Now that very nearly made me follow the press-here-to-read-more. Dammit, I want to wake up feeling sentient magnficient from head to abdomen and all over additional. How could anyone resist ?
Mind you, that mail had assumed my name to be Fidelia Xaftlbe, which is not the sort of behaviour you want from someone making offers like that.
The latest volley of spam all seems to come from computer generated addresses, which have a proper 'name', but the part of the address before the @ sign is just a string of eight letters. Imagine my delight to be mailed by oocelotw! Not just an ocelot, but a computer-generated one! Disappointingly, it turned out not to be an ocelot at all, but an individual called Lena with poor sentence-construction and a habit of using "u" for "you". She thanked me for my mail and offered to send me a picture - generous, but disappointing when I'd been hoping for a big cat.
Today brings a mail from an Agatha - and you don't get many of those these days - telling me that "young and ruttish misses are waiting". While I fear that, if they are waiting for me, it may be a tediously long wait I am made extremely happy to see someone using the word ruttish. It is, perhaps, the kind of anachronistic and slightly coarse behavious one might expect from an Agatha.
However, I should make it clear that despite the number of offers in the past couple of weeks, I still don't want to buy a pre-owned Rolex watch. Especially not since I found my temporarily-mislaid Swatch this morning.
no subject
katzenjammers are indeed hangovers, they are also discordant noises, depression, and a comic strip.
But, wait a minute, no emails urging you to "Eat Cake" ...? ;)
no subject
No need - cakebadger is still staunchly on duty this morning.
no subject
I brought a slice back to my desk with me, so cakebadger could see me eat it.
no subject
See also the Einstürzende Neubauten song "Selbstportrait mit Kater".
no subject
I'm not very well up on my Einstürzende Neubauten - can you recommend a good album to approach them from ?
no subject
What to get depends on what you're after. For the very harsh clangy stuff, try "Kollaps" or "Strategen gegen Architecturen". The more recent stuff's less harsh - Tabula Rasa, Ende Neu or Perpetuum Mobile are good. Try the latter, perhaps.
Don't buy anything on Some Bizarre, though. They won't thank you for it. Actually, that's a good general rule. I don't know of anyone who's put records out on Some Bizarre who hasn't slagged the label off in public.
no subject
Yes, that's the one, it's on Perpetuum Mobile, at least I think that's what this old worn tape is :) My German is really non-existent, but I can identify a plea for water, and a line that seems to refer to "drinking an astronomical amount of schnaps astronomen haben den schnaps im weltall entdeckt. But I may be taking liberties with the translation :)
no subject
Very good song. Rather good album.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Someone he or she had hidden it behind intergalactic clouds
probably marked for safety by a creative hand
so the space cleaning lady will not take delight in it
Sometime the clouds will breakup for me
and the beautiful women waiting behind
feed me with truthful truffles
Finally water me with the essence
of their heavenly appearance
until everything glows ruby red around me
According to their website.
no subject
Anyone help me out here ?
no subject
no subject
Still pondering the idea of space cleaning ladies with a taste for schnaps ;)
no subject
Are they not getting bored of it not-working? Do they reckon if they keep on at us we'll eventually crack? And what's with the multiple copies?
Ugh, can't they set up a funding scheme for scam artists to teach them how to at have, at the very least, passable grammar, okay typing skills, and some idea of how to set up an original scam?
no subject
I suppose that, if you're set up to mail random bumf to millions of addresses, it's not so much a case of why would you carry on as what reason is there to stop ? It's so cheap as a means of broadcasting your message that you need a ludicrously tiny take-up to make it worthwhile to continue.
no subject
I shall have to console myself with thoughts of hamsters.
no subject
no subject
Failing that I just meant the normal fluffy cute little rodent things - I pass a pet shop on my way into work you see, so can stop in and say hi to the cute ickle things! Eeeeee!
no subject
no subject
They pulled it when they realised that their feeble claims that it isn't a DDoS attack crumble when exposed to even the lightest scrutiny, but you could keep an eye on www.makelovenotspam.com for news, and/or try to get it from somewhere else.
no subject
If someone's had their server 0VV/\/3d do you really want to be DOS-ing it ? Is that going to help ?
no subject
The DDoS is directed against the site to which the spam directs you to send your money, not against the site which originated the spam. Obviously someone was dug up to say, "The wrong site could get on Yahoo's list. Won't anyone think of the children?". Of course the predictable response to that is, "We're not perfect. Are you? Thought not", which lays out both sides of the argument sufficiently that everyone can choose their side.
If someone's had their server 0VV/\/3d do you really want to be DOS-ing it
I'll hazard a guess and say "sometimes we do". For the same reason that if someone has TB (or some other antisocial physical condition which is not malicious on their part), we want to jump on them swiftly and confine them to an infirmary. Hopefully what we then do is give them antibiotics and explain to them how to avoid catching TB in future. Or at least refer them to someone else who can.
TB hasn't been inconveniencing them (yet) to the degree that they can be bothered to put sufficient (as we see it) effort into sorting it out themselves, but the short period of confinement gets their attention on the matter (we regard as being) of critical importance, and more importantly stops them from giving anyone else TB.
I have a suspicion that this won't always happen when someone emails Yahoo to say "you zapped my server, which had been owned and was hosting some other bastard's website without my knowledge, so it wasn't my fault, you bastards, how dare you?". But for the purposes of this argument you're only asking for one hypothetical class of cases where DDoS is a good strategy, right?
Also, Yahoo claim that their intention was not to DDoS, and that this only happened by accident. Their intention was to constantly run the offending server at "95%" capacity, with the idea that the resulting bandwidth charges on that server will then make it unprofitable, without significantly impairing its general functions. But it's more interesting to defend the more extreme action.
no subject
The analogy breaks down there because being owned isn't usually contagious. So I guess I either have to change this to "stops them from coughing at people in a really annoying fashion", or I have to change the analogy from "having TB" to "having a live hand grenade strapped to their back".
no subject
Actually, as I understand it one of the standard things you do with a freshly-owned box (in addition to spamming or whatever else you were planning to do with it) is to set it scanning for other vulnerable machines that it can infect in turn...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject