View Hello, Duri, Duri, Duri Ya Ha Ha

[venta]

So far with Firefox (thoughts and comparisons with IE, my previous browser):

These thoughts are from downloading and using it over this week. I've not yet spent any real time playing around with properly.

• Tabs. Tabs are great. I like tabs. I can have one window containing all the pages I usually keep open, and don't have a task bar cluttered with windows.


• Loading pages: seems slower than IE, this may be just my perception. Firefox often loads pages in an odd way, which means the layout is very screwy during loading, but gets it right in the end.


• Firefox doesn't assume you want the file protocol when you try and open files on mapped drives. If I type "E:", it copes. If I type "E:/cvs/myfile.html" it complains that e is not a protocol. This is mildly annoying.


• I like Firefox's little file download manager window. It's tidier than IE's handling. I'm not, however, convinced of its ability to realise the file you're downloading has changed and actually fetch a new version. I need to test this.


• Firefox's search box (which works like a cut-down Google tool bar, but also works for Amazon, eBay, Dictionary.com, etc) is a nice idea. Its Google functionality is slightly less nice than the google tool bar, because it doesn't allow you to easily highlight your search terms. This could be worse, because...


• Searching a web page comes up as a little tidy, friendly-to-use bar at the base of the page, not a splatty dialog in the middle of what you're trying to read. For bonus points, not only does Ctrl-F bring this box up, but / does as well :)


• I have yet to find a way to stop Firefox from making noises when I search for text and fail to find it. Unwanted noises are Very Bad.

So, on balance, I think that's "does some things more nicely than IE". Notable exceptions are loading pages and making noises, but it scores very highly for having tabs. I think the last one just balances out the first two. I'll stick with it for a while longer, certainly, and may stay permanently.

Comments

Use of '/'

[bateleur.livejournal.com]

Vi ? Vi ?! VI ?!

That function is from less you barbarian !

<simmers with rage>

Re: Use of '/'

[venta.livejournal.com]

Now, now, play nicely, Bateleur.

Yes, I know where / comes from, but I choose to humour vi users.

Re: Use of '/'

[venta.livejournal.com]

Actually, out of curiosity, I wondered if Firefox fairmindedly pandered to emacs users, and supported Ctrl-S. It doesn't of course, that's a "save" - is Ctrl-S intercepted by Windows, as the options box that comes up looks Windows rather than Firefox flavoured ?

Re: Use of '/'

[bateleur.livejournal.com]

I don't think it's Windows.

That said, I'm not enough of an Emacs advocate to suggest that other things should adopt its save/search convention. The clumsiness of C-x,C-s only makes sense in the context of the complete set of keybindings, some of which would be chosen differently if done from scratch in the modern world.

(Also, pedantically, Emacs's C-s and Wordpad C-f don't actually do the same thing. The former is marginally more useful !)

Re: Use of '/'

[venta.livejournal.com]

Ctrl-S is search-from-where-I-am and Ctrl-F is search-from-top ?

Or is there some other difference I haven't noticed ?

Re: Use of '/'

[wimble.livejournal.com]

EMACS' is incremental-search-forward (search as you type), where Wordpad uses search-forward (enter search string, and then jump to it).

Specifically, in EMACS, you can delete characters from the end of the search string, and put another suffix on, in real time.

Re: Use of '/'

[venta.livejournal.com]

Blimey. I'd never noticed that a Ctrl-F search wasn't incremental.

Pah.

Re: Use of '/'

[wimble.livejournal.com]

It's not intercepted by Windows (ha! We've had an argument with Oracle support about how F1 is implemented as Help by the operating system, so it's not possible to alter the behaviour. Of course, this is rubbish.)

But on Windows, it brings up the normal Windows save dialogue, which is what I'd expect. It sounds like you're not on Windows?

Re: Use of '/'

[venta.livejournal.com]

Eh ? In what way does it sound like I'm not using Windows ?

Re: Use of '/'

[wimble.livejournal.com]

My Firefox is Windows flavoured, so I don't notice any particular discrepancy between my Firefox browser window, and the Save As window.

I'd expect that, since M$ got their act together, and made the essential Windows dialogues generally available, applications should use those dialogues (Remember the days of individually crufted Print dialogues under Windows 3.1?)

Now, if I were using Firefox under Linux, and the Save As looked like the Windows one, I'd find that sufficient jarring to comment. (Where I should actually be writing KDE, or Gnome rather than Linux, since this is a feature of the Window Manager, rather than the OS).

It's

Re: Use of '/'

[venta.livejournal.com]

I'd expect that, since M$ got their act together, and made the essential Windows dialogues generally available, applications should use those dialogues

I didn't know this.

The Firefox download dialog is noticeably Firefoxy. I therefore expected the save-as dialog to be Firefoxy too.

Re: Use of '/'

[wimble.livejournal.com]

M$ don't provide a download manager, that's why ;-)

Token eMac user comment!

[inskauldrak.livejournal.com]

umm, crtl-s isn't "save" for a Mac (of any flavour), nor as far as I'm aware is it ever a 'search'

Having used Macs from the old ClassicII, thorugh PowerPC, iMac and now the shiny, lovely, gorgeous eMac *strokes his 'puter fondly* the 'control' button just basically ain't one of those buttons that you use on a Mac.

Re: Token eMac user comment!

[venta.livejournal.com]

Nah, you misunderstand :)

We weren't talking about these new fangled Mac machine things - we were talking about emacs, a text editing program[*] which has been kicking around for donkeys years. Nothing to do with Macs at all, it was originally evolved for Unix.

(Backplot as to what else was going on - the other text editing program of similar age, venerability, complexity and arcanity is vi. People use one or the other. You know how the green/purple debate goes ? Yeah, well the emacs/vi debate goes rather like that.)

[*] Kinda like Notepad. But with knobs on. Lots of knobs. And some bells. And whistles. And some weird wiggly bits of uncertain function. And more knobs.

Re: Token eMac user comment!

[venta.livejournal.com]

I've actually never used a Mac, y'know :) Up until zandev starting toting his shiny tiny Mac laptop around, I'd never even seen one.

Re: Token eMac user comment!

[inskauldrak.livejournal.com]

they are very shiny : ) Especially these days - OSX is Unix based and therefore not only very stable*, it's very handy for Mark to be able to do cunning techie stuff with 'puters talking to each other. We couldn't find how to open the relevant window-thing... until we just did a help search for it and it's first option was 'would you like to open one'

Oh yeah, and barring the odd game, when a Mac crashes, it gives you an error message and the manual tells you what kind of error it is (as opposed to odd messages that are only useful if you have tech-support).

Gah! I really am a 'Mac User' - we always go on about how good they are *blushes*

*In a year I've had one crash -- and that was MythIII's fault.

Re: Use of '/'

[http://users.livejournal.com/_corpse_/]

I don't believe I've ever used less.

Hey ho, barbarian me. And unrepentant too.

You wanna watch that rage, a watched rage never boils.