venta: (Default)
[personal profile] venta
Pretty much my favourite chocolate bar is a Double Decker. It's run a close second by a Marathon (which I still resolutely refuse to call a Snickers because, well, it's just silly. And "eating your snickers" sounds like some sort of shoddy euphemism. But I digress.)

So, Double Deckers and Marathons ?

Well, you can now buy a Double Decker with nuts in. Which tastes, not unsurprisingly, like a cross between the two.

<joyful munching noises>

Date: 2004-09-21 04:48 am (UTC)
ext_550458: (Default)
From: [identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com
Eeuw! My two least favourite chocolate bars! I bet you like Boost, too, don't you?

Anything with rice krispies, nougat or nuts in it is bad.

Date: 2004-09-21 04:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
I don't dislike Boost, they've never impinged on my consciousness all that much though. I tend to think of them as some sort of Johnny-come-lately wannabe chocolate bar, and would only get round to eating one if the world appeared to have run out of everything else (except Fry's Turkish Delight, and that Fry's chocolate cream stuff, which are both foul and should on no account be eaten).

Date: 2004-09-21 05:00 am (UTC)
ext_550458: (Default)
From: [identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com
Fry's Turkish Delight: mmmmm

Fry's Chocolate Cream: acceptable, but the mint cream one is waaaay nicer. Had a big 'thing' on those about 3 years ago.

My current big 'thing' is for mint Aeros.

Date: 2004-09-21 05:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Great - when the Apocalypse comes and Civilisation As We Know It breaks down, I shall go looting with you. I'll have all the nice things, and you can have all the revolting cack and it sounds like we'll both be happy :)

Date: 2004-09-21 05:05 am (UTC)
ext_550458: (Default)
From: [identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com
A profitable arrangement!

Date: 2004-09-21 08:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broadmeadow.livejournal.com
Double Decker is 28 (introduced 1976) and Boost 19 (introduced 1985). Compared to Fry's Turkish Delight (80 / 1924) they're both Johnny-come-lately types!

Double Decker's are great. They're crunchy, in a chewy sort of way -or so the original ads went. You youngsters probably won't remember that! (Don't know how long they ran those for). Boost were essential student fare, although they're a bit too stodgy for me these days.

Date: 2004-09-21 04:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mr-tom.livejournal.com
Aww, maaaan! DoubleDeckers++!

But Marathons are manky, peanuts need dry-roasted-flavour chemicals!

Date: 2004-09-21 05:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stegzy.livejournal.com
Double deckers are my favorite too. The new Cadburys Dairy Milk with wafer is quickly catching up on the top spot though.....incidently have you been here?

Date: 2004-09-21 05:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
I've not been to that site before, though I doubt I get through enough sweets to make it worth ordering.

I am slightly disappointed, though, that their nostalgia section doesn't seem to sell the sweets I want... Tutti Fruities! Tutti Minties! Those things that were like creme eggs but full of minty stuff instead of revolting goo!

And they lie! Look:

...we sell our 'weigh out' sweets by 150 grams which is well over 'a quarter of" a bag of sweets! (100 grams is just over 1/4lb)

Surely 1/4lb is about 113g ? Not that it's that important :)

Date: 2004-09-21 05:24 am (UTC)
ext_550458: (Default)
From: [identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com
Ah! Minty Eggs!

Here, it seems, our looting arrangement might break down.

Date: 2004-09-21 06:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.com
Ah, but it's not a proper quarter of, it's a "quarter of", which is apparently more like a fifth.

Date: 2004-09-21 08:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phlebas.livejournal.com
Is that including or excluding the thumb?

Date: 2004-09-21 05:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] addedentry.livejournal.com
Yes, at last a Kit Kat it's okay to eat without giving money to Evil Nestlé!

As a classifier type, I also approve of the regathering and rebranding of all Cadbury's bars under the 'Dairy Milk +' scheme. It's an attempt to combat falling sales of individual bars by giving them the boost [sic] of Dairy Milk's reputation, but it's also nice and tidy (-:

Date: 2004-09-21 09:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broadmeadow.livejournal.com
Cadbury's version of the Kit Kat was called Bar Six. Dunno when they phased it out, but I recall it cost 7d when my pocket money was only 6d!

Date: 2004-09-21 05:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_corpse_/
What's it called? Is it a Double Deckathon or a Maradecker?

Either of which would be cool.

Date: 2004-09-21 05:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
It's called a "Double Decker with Nuts".

Sheesh. I ask you.

Some people just don't know a marketing opportunity when it's glaring them in the face.

Date: 2004-09-21 05:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_corpse_/
I think [livejournal.com profile] kauket and [livejournal.com profile] onebyone were a Double Deckathon at [livejournal.com profile] smiorgan and [livejournal.com profile] triskellian's wedding.

Or perhaps they did a Double Deckathon.

Difficult to say.

Especially six times in a row, quickly.

My favourite joke 15 years ago

Date: 2004-09-21 06:30 am (UTC)
ext_44: (treguard)
From: [identity profile] jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com
What do you call a creature with eight legs?
An octopus.

What do you call a creature with ten legs?
A decapus.

What do you call a creature with twenty legs?
A double-decapus.

Re: My favourite joke 15 years ago

Date: 2004-09-21 10:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cardinalsin.livejournal.com
Surely its a do-decapus?

Date: 2004-09-21 05:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secretrebel.livejournal.com
Didn't the Marathon recipe change when it became Snickers. I have a feeling it did, which is some justification for my bizarre insistance on calling it by the name on the packet.

Date: 2004-09-21 05:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
What you tell me three times is true :)

I don't know about the recipe change. I don't remember it, but then I'm not sure I ever ate enough Marathons to be familiar enough to tell the difference.

Date: 2004-09-21 06:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secretrebel.livejournal.com
Eeek! I have no idea why my post got triple posted. Weird. I'm going to delete the other two now because it frightens me to see that many remarks by me.

I never really ate a lot of Marathons, it was only after the name change that I started eating them.

Date: 2004-09-21 06:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com
Didn't the Marathon recipe change when it became Snickers.

Nope.

Also, [livejournal.com profile] venta, you just be careful dissing modern chocolate bars (qv. comments on Boost above). It might be taken as implied criticism of Fuse bars - and that's fighting talk !

Date: 2004-09-21 07:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Er... Fuse ?

Y'see, these modern chocolate bars just don't have the punch of the old ones - they're not distinctive enough to be memorable :) I know I've eaten a Fuse in the past, but the best I can manage is that I think it was a bit like a Picnic (so kind of nobbly and nutty and raisiny). But I'm not at all sure.

Of course, if you want to educate me by buying me lots of chocolate, I'll try and cope :)

Out of interest, what used to be advertised as "slightly rippled with a flat underside" ? Was that Boost ?

Date: 2004-09-21 07:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_corpse_/
It was indeed.

Ah, Vic 'n' Bob.

Or rather... ah, Bob. Am I alone in having found Bob a lot funnier than Vic?

Date: 2004-09-21 07:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_corpse_/
And if you want to relive the moment... it's here, 10th from the bottom.


Date: 2004-09-21 08:19 am (UTC)
ext_44: (potter)
From: [identity profile] jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com
I would go so far as to say that Bob does far less of the "so far off the wall it's a complete miss" stuff and so has a better record of success, but I have a suspicion that neither Vic nor Bob would be paricularly funny on their own and need each other in order to be funny.

Great page of ads you link to below, by the way. My favourite is the Clark's Magic Shoes 1988 one, third on the page.

Date: 2004-09-21 08:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_corpse_/
I guess there's a similarity there to Rik Mayall and Adrian Edmundson. I always found Adrian to be funnier, because he was less manically OTT than Rik.

You're probably right about them being less funny in isolation though.

Date: 2004-09-21 08:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broadmeadow.livejournal.com
Well, Vic did start up on his own. Bob joined him after seeing him at one of this shows. (So the story goes, anyway).

Date: 2004-09-21 08:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] broadmeadow.livejournal.com
I with you on calling Marathon Bars by their proper name. Same goes for Opal Fruits.

But Marathon are made by Mars (or Masterfoods, or whatever they're called these days) not Cadbury, so have superior chocolate on them, obviously.

<ducks>

Date: 2004-09-21 10:31 am (UTC)
pm215: (Default)
From: [personal profile] pm215
For a moment I was deceived into thinking that the tuck shop here at work might have been stocked with these; but no, I had to make do with a bog-standard Double Decker...

Date: 2004-09-22 02:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
I fooled Davek with that one, too :)

No, I brought mine down from the Shepherds Hill garage.

So, what's got a hazelnut in every bite?

Date: 2004-09-21 11:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grumblesmurf.livejournal.com
A: Squirrel shit.

Bad Liz - no biscuit. Or Snickerdecker or whatever it is. Now I'll have to go out and hunt one of these down to see what they're like. Peanuts, or proper nuts by the way?

Like you, Double Deckers are one of my favourite chocolate bars - there's enough substance to them to make them satisfying to fill a hole (behave at the back) and you can't wolf a whole one really quickly since they take some chewing.

In the event of a chocolate emergency though, there's always the good old fashioned standby of a Mars, especially one from the fridge, that never fails to reach the parts other chocolate doesn't reach.

Marathons are so-so - too much caramel gunk and crappy nuts. I'd eat one if there was little else but otherwise I'll pass. Aside from the traditional Mars bar itself I don't find there's much that Mars puts out that I'm actually that bothered by. Nestle too, for that matter, with the sole exception of Kit-Kats (though I'm less fond of the giant chunky ones - too much biscuit, not enough chocolate). And there's not a great deal that Cadburys do that I'm that bothered by either so there's not a great deal of choice.

Topics, however, at least before they shrank the normal size to a single bite whilst cranking the price right up, used to be a decent enough snack. Not even a snack-lite (TM) these days though.

My biggest irritation though is that there aren't any really decent plain chocolate snacks about - none of this milk chocolate nonsense for me, thanks. About the only thing beyond a chocolate orange that I can recall (outside of a regular bar of the stuff) is a Jameson's Raspberry Ruffle, but you can't seem to find those about these days.

Re: So, what's got a hazelnut in every bite?

Date: 2004-09-22 02:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Peanuts, or proper nuts by the way?

Er, I'm not sure actually. Sort of unidentified nuttiness.
If forced to choose, I guess I'd say 'peanuts'.

Re: So, what's got a hazelnut in every bite?

Date: 2004-09-22 02:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] venta.livejournal.com
Double Deckers are one of my favourite chocolate bars - there's enough substance to them to make them satisfying to fill a hole (behave at the back) and you can't wolf a whole one really quickly since they take some chewing.

This is true. However, for a long time I found myself wishing that someone, somewhere would produce a snack which was about the size, shape and fillingness of a Mars bar - but savoury.

The obvious answer would be, say, a sausage roll but most non-bakery are repellently dry, and never seem to me to be quite the right thing. I therefor salute Ginsters for the creation of the Buffet Bar (http://www.ginsters.co.uk/products.cfm?productid=30), which does exactly what I want.

Ginsters' Roasters (http://www.ginsters.co.uk/products.cfm?productid=49) are great too - like a sausage roll but with added bacon.

Date: 2004-09-21 03:32 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
There are plain chocolate Mars bars (?Midnight Mars) but yes, in general, virtually no snack-type bars in plain chocolate.

Profile

venta: (Default)
venta

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 08:32 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios