Page Summary
arralethe.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
venta.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cardinalsin.livejournal.com - (no subject)- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
wimble.livejournal.com - Controversy!
frax.livejournal.com - (no subject)- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
- (Anonymous) - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 08:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 08:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 08:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 09:07 am (UTC)It's tremendously amusing that of the seven respondents to the second poll, between us we have a 0% success rate at earning the required 750 (or was it 1,000?) points for success (second-class success at that) even once.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 09:11 am (UTC)Hmm. We had postulated 70s, I didn't realise they went back so far. So basically, those of us in the backward north were still playing the games of the 50s well into the 80s :)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 09:20 am (UTC)Our collective ineptitude grows still further: having gone 0-for-11 at even a single book between us. Not quite sure how many of your second poll voters went to Oxbridge - at a guess, "most of them" - but that really doesn't say much in favour of our collective observation skills :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 09:22 am (UTC)I'd have thought it was more an apathy-based problem :)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 09:24 am (UTC)Out of interest, why would you say that ? At a quick count, I think I make it around half. Though there's some people I don't know where they went to university.
And I have no idea why people at Oxbridge should be more observant - head in the clouds, most of 'em :)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 09:25 am (UTC)Wasn't it the case that you were allowed to self-certify yourself as a second-class (whatever) at n points and only needed to send the book off for ratification when you claimed the title of first-class (whatever) at n+x points? (*) We might well have a second-class spy amongst us yet.
(*) And so the D&D XP/level system was born, only counting backwards, in a different country as part of a game that the D&D pioneers would likely never have seen.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 09:31 am (UTC)Why I said that was because all the people I know on your Friends list went to Oxbridge - so, by obviously correct and safe extrapolation, so must all the people I don't know on your Friends list must have gone there as well. Ahem.
And I have no idea why people at Oxbridge should be more observant - head in the clouds, most of 'em :)
Sad but true!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 10:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-06 03:04 pm (UTC)I belong to the 'had a book once but never finished it' brigade but I'm old & I went to Durham
Controversy!
Date: 2004-01-06 04:26 pm (UTC)The first says it started with the News Chronicle, and then moved to The Daily Mail. The second link has the chronology in the reverse order. More noticably, they credit different people with actually being Big Chief I-Spy.
Maybe I ought to ask my mother if she's still got any of mine.
"I-spy Computer Hardware" anybody? Double points for a PDP-8!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-07 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-08 01:05 am (UTC)Better still, Victoria, my daughter, is also a fan of them. We've found some pretty obscure road/roadside signs!
--
Richard (age 38 but feeling younger)