Put out the lights on the age of reason
Feb. 27th, 2013 10:29 amHelp me, LJ, you (and your knowledge of physics) are my only hope.
Why do LEDs bounce up and down in car mirrors?
I noticed ages ago that, when driving down the motorway, the LED variable-speed-limit signs bounce around crazily when seen in the rear-view mirror. Obviously in a mirror you're looking at the other carriageway's signs, and the road, cars, streetlights, gantry etc are all more or less stationary but the LED signs? Well, they're joggling around like wild things.
Trundling back on Monday from a trip to Scotland, I spotted that some cars (mostly newish Mercs, I think) now have a strip of white LEDs under their normal headlights. When viewed through the rear mirror the car and the headlights look perfectly sensible, while the LEDs are - you'll have guessed - madly dancing around. I don't know if our car has an unusually vibration-prone mirror, but in general the image in the mirror seems stable.
I haven't noticed this driving at non-motorway speeds - though I'm also not sure if I've had the requisite LEDs-behind-me in any other situation.
I just asked Physics!colleague about it, and his first theory ran thusly: LEDs have quite a narrow field of view (compared to other lights), so if the object in the mirror is offset (as a sign on the other carriageway would be) you might be on the edge of the field of view, and the effect is that the light pops in and out of vision. This feels inherently wrong to me: I'd expect the sign to look more flickery than it does. Also, a Merc driving in the lane behind me is not offset.
His second theory (bolstered by a quick google) was that there is no such effect, I am insane, and ChrisC (who claims also to have observed it) is just humouring me.
So... has anyone else seen this happen? Anyone know why it happens?
Why do LEDs bounce up and down in car mirrors?
I noticed ages ago that, when driving down the motorway, the LED variable-speed-limit signs bounce around crazily when seen in the rear-view mirror. Obviously in a mirror you're looking at the other carriageway's signs, and the road, cars, streetlights, gantry etc are all more or less stationary but the LED signs? Well, they're joggling around like wild things.
Trundling back on Monday from a trip to Scotland, I spotted that some cars (mostly newish Mercs, I think) now have a strip of white LEDs under their normal headlights. When viewed through the rear mirror the car and the headlights look perfectly sensible, while the LEDs are - you'll have guessed - madly dancing around. I don't know if our car has an unusually vibration-prone mirror, but in general the image in the mirror seems stable.
I haven't noticed this driving at non-motorway speeds - though I'm also not sure if I've had the requisite LEDs-behind-me in any other situation.
I just asked Physics!colleague about it, and his first theory ran thusly: LEDs have quite a narrow field of view (compared to other lights), so if the object in the mirror is offset (as a sign on the other carriageway would be) you might be on the edge of the field of view, and the effect is that the light pops in and out of vision. This feels inherently wrong to me: I'd expect the sign to look more flickery than it does. Also, a Merc driving in the lane behind me is not offset.
His second theory (bolstered by a quick google) was that there is no such effect, I am insane, and ChrisC (who claims also to have observed it) is just humouring me.
So... has anyone else seen this happen? Anyone know why it happens?
no subject
Date: 2013-02-27 11:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-02-27 11:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-02-27 11:39 am (UTC)</implausible_handwaving>
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-02-27 01:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-02-27 04:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-02-27 10:19 pm (UTC)Oh yes, so they do. And it's not in rhythm with my heartbeat either.
I wonder if it's to do with saccades, which are about tens of ms long. Something to do with LED lighting being an array of small point sources of light and your eyes don't quite get back to the same position each time they look at the array, so your brain gets lots of overlapping images displaced by ~100ms of the the same array at slightly different places on the retina? That sounds vaguely plausible. I wonder how you could test it. There's got to be a trick with video somewhere.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-02-28 02:33 am (UTC)OK - now to freak you further.
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2013/02/flash-lag-illusion.html