venta: (Default)
venta ([personal profile] venta) wrote2012-01-04 03:57 pm

And seven, seven for no tomorrow

Public Service Announcement (for anyone who uses Reading railway station with low-to-moderate frequency[*]).

Reading station has - for more than a year now - been in the throes of major refurbishment. However, beyond annoying closures, the work hasn't been affecting travellers much (AFAIK) to date.

Since the station re-opened after Christmas, almost all the platforms have been given new numbers. So if, like me, you catch the 1918 from platform 4 every Tuesday evening, you might be slightly surprised to find it departing from platform 7. Do not gallop over the footbridge to old-7! The train still goes from the same physical location it always did, it's just that that location is now called 7.

The re-numbering is pretty sensible, really. They've got rid of the confusing 4a and 4b (now known as 5 and 6; platform new-4 is a whole new platform that wasn't formerly there). There are shiny new signs and things pointing in all the right directions.

In general trains still seem to go from the same locations, but since there are two new platforms (4 and 16) I presume that won't be completely true. At some point platforms 12-15 are going to show up as well, but they're not there yet.

If you're interested, the work is a general upgrade of the station, making it more spacious, and adding new lifts and escalators. They're also widening the footbridge, and generally making it more accessible and less bottle-necky. Which are all good things to do. It just means that until (at least) Easter next year it will be in various levels of turmoil. And quite why they decided to, as their first step, remove the roof at the beginning of December is a mystery. A temporary roof will apparently be put in at the end of January.

[*] I reckon if you actually frequent the place you'll already know, and if you rarely visit it then you'll just read the screens and signs and be fine :)

Edit: They've also replaced Cow Lane Bridge, which is of less global import, but comes with an exciting time-lapse film. Fun if you want to watch armies of little orange people and cartoony diggers replacing a bridge.

[identity profile] bateleur.livejournal.com 2012-01-04 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I love a good timelapse, but I feel a bit cheated that the actual bridge appeared fully formed 36s into the film without so much as a "Here's one we made earlier"!
chrisvenus: (Default)

[personal profile] chrisvenus 2012-01-05 09:51 am (UTC)(link)
I liked that, mainly because of that awesome bridge carrying vehicle that they had. :)

[identity profile] venta.livejournal.com 2012-01-05 12:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I liked that too! Though it seemed to fit the bridge so exactly it's difficult to believe it wasn't purpose-built. Which surely it wasn't!?

[identity profile] octalbunny.livejournal.com 2012-01-05 06:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Why wouldn't it be purpose-built? The whole road-widening was done on the railway budget, so cost nothing at all to Reading taxpayers.

(At least, that's my recollection of the council press release when the Cow Lane Bridges upgrade was announced.)

[identity profile] hjalfi.livejournal.com 2012-01-05 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know about the Cow Lane one, but I gather that the Caversham Bridge carrier was custom built...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPDE8NjjC8k

[identity profile] exspelunca.livejournal.com 2012-01-05 04:20 pm (UTC)(link)
If only they'd work at that speed on the North Yorkshire A1 upgrade!

[identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com 2012-01-05 06:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, and inserting 4 and renumbering 4a and 4b gives more than one extra, so they can't avoid a renumbering by putting in a Platform 0 like at KGX.

[identity profile] ceb.livejournal.com 2012-01-09 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Tiny hyperactive diggers! So cute!