And an intelligent conversation can be had about the nature of these tradeoffs. But the idea that either the Yes or No campaign is engaging in this conversation, or that one is on the side of the angels... well, it may be your opinion, but it's woefully short on fact.
I never suggested they were angels - I said "not everything the Fairer Votes campaign have said is 100% accurate".
I've seen focus on the reduction of tactical voting, so there is some focus at least on the voting theory side of things. All I've seen from No2AV on this is "It means the loser wins" and "Some people have more votes than others"...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2011-04-18 09:12 pm (UTC)And an intelligent conversation can be had about the nature of these
tradeoffs. But the idea that either the Yes or No campaign is engaging in
this conversation, or that one is on the side of the angels... well, it
may be your opinion, but it's woefully short on fact.
I never suggested they were angels - I said "not everything the Fairer Votes campaign have said is 100% accurate".
I've seen focus on the reduction of tactical voting, so there is some focus at least on the voting theory side of things. All I've seen from No2AV on this is "It means the loser wins" and "Some people have more votes than others"...