venta: (Default)
venta ([personal profile] venta) wrote2010-03-05 03:47 pm
Entry tags:

Let's do it like they do on the discovery channel

Once you've taken into account any extenuating circusmtances, mitigating or aggravating factors, and medical evidence in a case of gross misconduct, are you left with net misconduct ?

Just wondering.

[identity profile] hirez.livejournal.com 2010-03-05 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes.

Although that would require the wearing of unfortunate tights in the off season.

[identity profile] ringbark.livejournal.com 2010-03-05 06:47 pm (UTC)(link)
When I was charged with gross misconduct, I was able to get off because I could show I had only misconducted 143 times.

[identity profile] shui-long.livejournal.com 2010-03-05 06:51 pm (UTC)(link)
No, net misconduct covers things like publicly re-posting someone's private e-mail message... which could, depending on the circumstances, also be gross misconduct.

[identity profile] phlebas.livejournal.com 2010-03-08 11:50 am (UTC)(link)
Net indecency is gross.

[identity profile] onebyone.livejournal.com 2010-03-07 03:07 pm (UTC)(link)
As long as you only commit misconduct up to a certain number of times a year, they're the same anyway.