Entry tags:
I hope it's the promotion you've been looking for
Today at work, our nice admin lady popped out to tell me I had a phonecall. This hasn't happened before: personal calls would come in on my mobile, and I have no cause in my ordinary line of work to talk to customers. However, <Mystery Name> from <Mystery Company> was on the line and, in the absence of our usual support person, had asked for me by name.
After some flapping (who? and what were they going to ask? because I'm not meant to be customer facing, I've not yet learned the company song and might say all kinds of inappropriate things), I took the call in an empty office.
It turned out to be a headhunter, acting on a "personal referral". He wasn't hunting for anything in particular, it turned out, more representing a (to quote their own website) "pro-active recruitment service". No, I wasn't interested.
I asked who had referred me - I don't even know whether I believe such a person existed, he might well have just pulled my CV off an agency site, leftover from last summer's jobhunting. He said that people were "understandably apprehensive" and therefore referrals were in strictest confidence.
He asked if I had any friends or colleagues who might be interested in hearing from him and I said that I wasn't willing to give out other peoples' contact details without their permission, since some people do not like it. He expressed surprise, and said he'd virtually never met that attitude.
"So why are people 'understandably apprehensive'?" I didn't ask.
So now I'm curious: I take it as read that giving out people's details is liable to piss them off. Maybe I'm wrong.
[Poll #1136892]
On the plus side: most of this conversation took place when he rang me back at home this evening. I'm not looking to change jobs right now, but thought I'd hear him out in case he was going to offer me a part-time job with a telephone number salary. He rang me back. At the time he said he would. This already puts him ahead of any of the recruitment agencies I spoke to while I was actually jobhunting last June.
After some flapping (who? and what were they going to ask? because I'm not meant to be customer facing, I've not yet learned the company song and might say all kinds of inappropriate things), I took the call in an empty office.
It turned out to be a headhunter, acting on a "personal referral". He wasn't hunting for anything in particular, it turned out, more representing a (to quote their own website) "pro-active recruitment service". No, I wasn't interested.
I asked who had referred me - I don't even know whether I believe such a person existed, he might well have just pulled my CV off an agency site, leftover from last summer's jobhunting. He said that people were "understandably apprehensive" and therefore referrals were in strictest confidence.
He asked if I had any friends or colleagues who might be interested in hearing from him and I said that I wasn't willing to give out other peoples' contact details without their permission, since some people do not like it. He expressed surprise, and said he'd virtually never met that attitude.
"So why are people 'understandably apprehensive'?" I didn't ask.
So now I'm curious: I take it as read that giving out people's details is liable to piss them off. Maybe I'm wrong.
[Poll #1136892]
On the plus side: most of this conversation took place when he rang me back at home this evening. I'm not looking to change jobs right now, but thought I'd hear him out in case he was going to offer me a part-time job with a telephone number salary. He rang me back. At the time he said he would. This already puts him ahead of any of the recruitment agencies I spoke to while I was actually jobhunting last June.

no subject
no subject
I would be very unhappy if a headhunter called me on a landline at my workplace. That's bad form IMHO.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
If I was feeling charitable I would have offered to pass the headhunters details on to anyone I knew who may have been interested.
no subject
no subject
Can't complain too much, I've got my last two jobs from pimps cold-calling me.
no subject
no subject
no subject
how could he have "never" met the attitude of people not wanting to hand over their friends' details
Discarding my above theory, perhaps because he generally only deals with other weasels, who are perfectly willing to do things which will piss off their friends, provided it can't be traced back.
no subject
Having some dubious business cards printed, and leaving them in a Mayfair phone box I am less likely to be pleased about.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
job with a telephone number salary
I once had one of those. Unfortunately it was 999.
no subject
After a couple of weeks of this our receptionists started recognising them and put them through to us, and I had an entertaining time pretending to be someone else until they revealed who they were recruiting for (several companies, at least one of which we were working with and had a non-competition agreement with). We then took great delight in contacting the people they were allegedly recruiting for (unsurprisingly, the companies in question hadn't actually hired the recruiters, they were just doing it speculatively based on job ads on the web) and warning them that they probably want to give that agency a wide berth.
We're not sure, but we think you can force people to tell you where they got their details from under the Data Protection Act- you can certainly tell them to remove them.
no subject
In this case, where the recruiter has no information about at all other than that you're employable, I'd probably be more annoyed than if someone recommended me to a recruiter for a particular job or set of jobs. I don't want to just be permanently "on the books" of someone who has, in practice, little chance of figuring out what jobs I'd even apply for.
Personally I'd actually not mind any more if a recruiter was given my work phone number. Maybe it would offend my employer for a recruiter to call me at work, but they can hardly blame me for that since I've clearly never heard of this person. And if the recruiter doesn't have my mobile number, that's good news too. It strikes me as being a question of etiquette between recruiters and employers, rather than anything I have to worry about. I don't mind my employer knowing that in theory, under certain circumstances, I would take a better job. They'd have to be stupid not to think that, and a polite pretence need only go so far.
I wouldn't accept multiple calls at work from a recruiter, though - that would seem unreasonable. And I knew that the recruiter had got my name and work number from anything work-related, it would feel slightly like soliciting a new job through work activities, which I think is a bit rude.