Entry tags:
Too much dirty rice, too many beans
You're all gourmets, right ? Or at the least gourmands. So, tell me about...
I have vague memories, when I was little, of eating leftovers fried with rice which were called risotto. The memories are very vague, though, so the mother may come along to comment that I didn't eat such things (or, at least, didn't eat them at home).
Fast forward twenty-odd years until I'm doing post-graduate study and living in a rather swish flat belonging to my college. My flat-mate is an Australian post-doc called Donna. She's vegetarian, and sometimes makes risotto. She does this by slowly stirring wine and stock into rice. No frying is involved. The result is fantastic.
Learning in equal parts from Donna and from a rather wonderful Thane Prince cookbook, I taught myself to make risotto. Experimentation has shown that I tend to prefer vegetable risottos (risotti ?) - favourites are mushroom and cashew, mushroom and leek, mushroom, spinach and Wensleydale (spotting a theme here?).
Once I got a job and started eating out more, I took to ordering risotti in restaurants. Which is where the story takes a sad turn. I discovered that one of these things is true:
- restaurants cannot make risotto
- I cannot make risotto
My evidence for this is that risotti in restaurants tend to be inferior (in my opinion) to mine. They're often gluggy, puddingy, sloppy, or too rich. On Tuesday I went out for lunch to a place which my colleauges tell me serves nice food. However their chicken, leek and stilton risotto was vaguely terrifying. Imagine extremely heavily cheesed rice-pudding, with immense lumps of chicken. I'd have put in less chicken, shredded what I did put in, and gone easy on the cheese. Oh, and served a portion about 50% of the size. I don't know why I still order risotto when out; a triumph of optimism over experience, I suppose.
Now in general I'd say I'm a reasonable cook; it's not, however, usual for me to consider I'm better at particular dishes than otherwise reputable restaurants. So, the inescapable conclusion is that the restaurants of South East England make beautiful risotto, and I make a peculiar parody which by some quirk of peversity I choose to prefer.
But.. but... mine's just nicer. It's creamy, but by slow cooking rather than the addition of cream. It doesn't have surprising lumps in it. It doesn't, mostly, resemble rice pudding. Except for the time when I bought Tesco's other kind of risotto rice - not arborio, but a name which escapes me. Carnellio ? Something beginning with C[*].
Once, I had a vague plan too cook mushroom risotto, but then discovered that all the ingredients I thought I had were gone. In place of white wine, I had red. In place of mushrooms, I had peppers and chillis. I went ahead and made it anyway. The result was nice enough and Frances and I ate it with grated cheddar and guacamole. We christened it "bizarro". While I'm not sure if that legally qualifies as risotto, it still had the correct texture.
It has been suggested that the reason I like my own risotto best is because by the time it comes to the table it - and often me - are very full of wine. I couldn't possibly comment.
So, the short version of the above is that I wish to eat a nice risotto. If you know of somewhere which will serve such a thing - preferably in Oxford, London, or somewhere nearby - then let me know. Or, y'know, if you cook a good risotto then invite me round for dinner.
[*] Wikipedia thinks I might mean Carnaroli.
I have vague memories, when I was little, of eating leftovers fried with rice which were called risotto. The memories are very vague, though, so the mother may come along to comment that I didn't eat such things (or, at least, didn't eat them at home).
Fast forward twenty-odd years until I'm doing post-graduate study and living in a rather swish flat belonging to my college. My flat-mate is an Australian post-doc called Donna. She's vegetarian, and sometimes makes risotto. She does this by slowly stirring wine and stock into rice. No frying is involved. The result is fantastic.
Learning in equal parts from Donna and from a rather wonderful Thane Prince cookbook, I taught myself to make risotto. Experimentation has shown that I tend to prefer vegetable risottos (risotti ?) - favourites are mushroom and cashew, mushroom and leek, mushroom, spinach and Wensleydale (spotting a theme here?).
Once I got a job and started eating out more, I took to ordering risotti in restaurants. Which is where the story takes a sad turn. I discovered that one of these things is true:
- restaurants cannot make risotto
- I cannot make risotto
My evidence for this is that risotti in restaurants tend to be inferior (in my opinion) to mine. They're often gluggy, puddingy, sloppy, or too rich. On Tuesday I went out for lunch to a place which my colleauges tell me serves nice food. However their chicken, leek and stilton risotto was vaguely terrifying. Imagine extremely heavily cheesed rice-pudding, with immense lumps of chicken. I'd have put in less chicken, shredded what I did put in, and gone easy on the cheese. Oh, and served a portion about 50% of the size. I don't know why I still order risotto when out; a triumph of optimism over experience, I suppose.
Now in general I'd say I'm a reasonable cook; it's not, however, usual for me to consider I'm better at particular dishes than otherwise reputable restaurants. So, the inescapable conclusion is that the restaurants of South East England make beautiful risotto, and I make a peculiar parody which by some quirk of peversity I choose to prefer.
But.. but... mine's just nicer. It's creamy, but by slow cooking rather than the addition of cream. It doesn't have surprising lumps in it. It doesn't, mostly, resemble rice pudding. Except for the time when I bought Tesco's other kind of risotto rice - not arborio, but a name which escapes me. Carnellio ? Something beginning with C[*].
Once, I had a vague plan too cook mushroom risotto, but then discovered that all the ingredients I thought I had were gone. In place of white wine, I had red. In place of mushrooms, I had peppers and chillis. I went ahead and made it anyway. The result was nice enough and Frances and I ate it with grated cheddar and guacamole. We christened it "bizarro". While I'm not sure if that legally qualifies as risotto, it still had the correct texture.
It has been suggested that the reason I like my own risotto best is because by the time it comes to the table it - and often me - are very full of wine. I couldn't possibly comment.
So, the short version of the above is that I wish to eat a nice risotto. If you know of somewhere which will serve such a thing - preferably in Oxford, London, or somewhere nearby - then let me know. Or, y'know, if you cook a good risotto then invite me round for dinner.
[*] Wikipedia thinks I might mean Carnaroli.
no subject
no subject
Actually, given the iterations it's been through, maybe the Jam Factory is a restaurant.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Since I know for a fact most restaurants and coffee shops make worse latte than I do, I can easily believe that there are plenty of restaurants that can't cook risotto either.
Unfortunately for a decent risotto, you're probably going to have to try somewhere with a Michelin star.
no subject
Hmm. I have (once) eaten at Le Manoir, and I'm wondering if one of the courses there might have been a risotto. Hmm. Some rummaging (http://zandev.livejournal.com/39329.html?view=184737) suggests it was. I'm disappointed that I don't have a clearer memory of it :(
no subject
no subject
Yours sound closer to that which Jeanette makes, you'll have to come round for tea some time :)
I've very occasionally had a decent risotto at a restaurant, but my hit rate is fairly low. Usually it's the stodge you described above. Can't recall any specific restaurants in the South of England though.
no subject
Lovely. I'll let you know when I'm passing next :)
no subject
(She was an Australian, mind.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
My LJ email address should work fine, and it really would be lvoely to see you, and catch up!
no subject
I've had risotto in Italy, and it was similar to mine, but the one I remember (I may have had others, but I've forgotten) was squid ink risotto, which is a slightly different kind of animal to, say, mushroom risotto, so it's hard to properly compare. In any case, it didn't make me think I'd been making the wrong thing all these years ;-)
no subject
And, er, it'd actually be nice to see you, too, since I haven't in ages.
no subject
The thing is, I like to order risotto at restaurants. It's one of the things which (along with torta di limone) I use as an indicator of quality. One day I will find a restaurant which does good risotto, and I'll go back to it again and again, finding other stuff on the menu, because it's a good place.
FTR, the mushroom risotto at Salt's Diner is the exception; I must have eaten tons of the stuff over the years we've been going there, and it has always been excellent.
no subject
I then went on to Paella (which uses a very similar method) which, I'm told, I'm pretty damn hot at making. :-)
no subject
no subject
There's an interesting controversy regarding making nice risotto, though: add flavourings before or after cooking the rice ? I invariably do the latter, but I've noticed that
Regarding Canaroli rice: fry it for about two minutes in a bit of oil before use. I actually slightly prefer it to Arborio, though to be honest I sometimes have a hard time telling them apart after cooking.
no subject
Not quite - which order I do it depends on the ingredients I'm using. If it's big, strong flavours that won't disintegrate on cooking, I add them at the beginning (mushrooms, thyme, bacon). If they're delicate wussy flavours that disappear as soon as you look at them, or that can't stand the length of cooking time, I add 'em at the end ('sparagus, prawns). And actually, even in the former case, I usually keep some back to add at the end for a bit of textural variety. Thanks for the compliment, though :-)
drain the excess water
This, btw, is an abomination. Water? Excess? Stock, wine, lemon juice, etc, but no excess left at the end, cos you've been adding it bit by bit, so all the flavour the liquid absorbs stays in the dish.
no subject
no subject
To my mind, the adding stock/wine a little at a time is absolutely the essence of risotto-making. I'm really surprised you can make anything even remotely edible by your method!
Still, I'll believe you if you say so :)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Our fave is Spinach.
I make it by the fry rice then gradually stir in method. Since Delia and Nigella also do it this way I assume I'm doing it right.
I usually add flavourings late/near the end.
And always use Arborio rice, it makes a difference.
no subject
no subject
no subject
* It'll be finished by whoever's on the veg/garnish station, which is the lowest on the heirarchy and thereby the most soul-destroying and likely to have a bitter and uncaring cook on.
* It needs good stock, and quite a lot of it. The saucier and saute chefs will have taken the best stock.
* Mushroom risotto is the ANSI standard vegetarian option. No-one cares about the vegetarian option.
* To do properly, it'll be par-cooked, blast-chilled and then finished a la minute. Or you could just make a huge batch and leave it at the back of the range.
* Since it holds heat well, it'll be the dish that gets to the passe first and is left under a heat lamp, waiting for the more delicate dishes to catch up.
Ah - I remember now: it was from a Konditor and Cook takeaway. Which was pleasantly surprising.
no subject
Saucier I can understand. But saute ? Does that not mean what I think it means in this context ? I don't see why someone who sautés things needs stock.
no subject
no subject
That said, you might want to give this place a go next time you're in London - risotto is all they do and (I'm told) they do it very well indeed. Give me a shout and I'll join you there.
no subject
no subject
Cool, that'd be nice. I'm not convinced you exist any more. And I still haven't met your Mrs (is she Mrs yet ? I've lost track).
no subject
I've never had a nice restaurant risotto either, not even in the very good Italian restaurant we sometimes go to.
no subject
no subject
Hmmm... Must follow up Jamie Oliver hint from other comment (that would be Mitch cooking and me being critical).
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-05-18 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
I appear to be a heretic though in that I don't think it's necessary to add the liquid a spoon at a time. I know roughly how much will be needed, and I put it in all in one go. If it's looking like the rice is absorbing it faster than you thought, add more -- if it's looking like you put too much in, open the saucepan lid to let some boil off. (I got this tip from a column by an Italian chef, maybe Carluccio?)