Leave out the book, I've got one of those
Mar. 7th, 2006 07:34 pmToday's rant will be on the subject of my least favourite deadly sin:
Sloth.
Now I can see a few puzzled looks at the back, there, eyeing the sofa and the DVD player. What's wrong with a good dose of sloth every now and again, you ask ? If you mean a bit of time spent lying on the sofa, doing nowt, or being similarly lazy then there's absolutely nothing wrong with that (says the Gospel according to Venta).
The BBC carried an article today about the decision of Newport council to limit households to one wheelie-bin's worth of rubbish per fortnight. Recycling is collected every week.
The article quotes the following Newport resident:
Mother-of-five Mandy Price, who fills over 20 bin bags aweek and does not recycle any rubbish, said she could not cope with the restriction. She told [the BBC]: "It's a pain really... I don't see why they just don't come once a week," adding: "You just put it in the bins, and you don't really think where it goes at all."
That's the kind of sloth I hate. Lazy, self-centered thinking which cannot even bother itself to consider wider implications. Ms Price is the reason restrictions like this have to be introduced, because people are too damned idle to actually stir themselves to care what is happening in the world around them.
Laziness can strike anyone, and I'm sure I'm guilty as much as anyone. But to be so blinkered as to be able to say something like the above, without even realising that it's such a shameful statement, makes me want to shout at Ms Price until she understands.
Which would be completely futile. It'd slide off, and she'd be left wondering who that rude girl was who was so opinionated. This new restriction is inconvenient to her - might even cause her to alter her routine a little or make some effort - and as such is unworkable. That it might be necessary simply isn't relevant. Why should she change her ways simply because the landfill sites in Wales are full ? No, no, you don't think where it all goes. It just goes.
More power to Newport council, I reckon, and I hope they fine Ms Price for every week she fails to make the brave and terrible step of putting the empty tins in the recycling box.
Incidentally: 20 bin-bags worth of rubbish per week ?
Frances and I manage to fill one bin bag a week, maximum. Admittedly, there are only two of us. If we assume the existence of a Mr Price, then this is a seven-person household. Maybe two or three of the children are still in nappies, and wear disposables (can anyone such as
bateleur give me a ball-park volume-of-rubbish for that ?) I guess small children might generate other sources of rubbish unknown to me, too.
I could believe that one wheelie bin of unrecyclable rubbish might be overly restrictive for a family of seven, over the course of two weeks. Having never had a wheelie bin, I'm rather vague as to their capacity. I gather Reading has a scheme for allowing larger families an extra bin, which seems perfectly sensible.
But really... twenty bin bags ? Am I being unreasonable in assuming that the family must live entirely off packaged foods, and not even do the simplest things, like squashing the packaging ?
Sloth.
Now I can see a few puzzled looks at the back, there, eyeing the sofa and the DVD player. What's wrong with a good dose of sloth every now and again, you ask ? If you mean a bit of time spent lying on the sofa, doing nowt, or being similarly lazy then there's absolutely nothing wrong with that (says the Gospel according to Venta).
The BBC carried an article today about the decision of Newport council to limit households to one wheelie-bin's worth of rubbish per fortnight. Recycling is collected every week.
The article quotes the following Newport resident:
Mother-of-five Mandy Price, who fills over 20 bin bags aweek and does not recycle any rubbish, said she could not cope with the restriction. She told [the BBC]: "It's a pain really... I don't see why they just don't come once a week," adding: "You just put it in the bins, and you don't really think where it goes at all."
That's the kind of sloth I hate. Lazy, self-centered thinking which cannot even bother itself to consider wider implications. Ms Price is the reason restrictions like this have to be introduced, because people are too damned idle to actually stir themselves to care what is happening in the world around them.
Laziness can strike anyone, and I'm sure I'm guilty as much as anyone. But to be so blinkered as to be able to say something like the above, without even realising that it's such a shameful statement, makes me want to shout at Ms Price until she understands.
Which would be completely futile. It'd slide off, and she'd be left wondering who that rude girl was who was so opinionated. This new restriction is inconvenient to her - might even cause her to alter her routine a little or make some effort - and as such is unworkable. That it might be necessary simply isn't relevant. Why should she change her ways simply because the landfill sites in Wales are full ? No, no, you don't think where it all goes. It just goes.
More power to Newport council, I reckon, and I hope they fine Ms Price for every week she fails to make the brave and terrible step of putting the empty tins in the recycling box.
Incidentally: 20 bin-bags worth of rubbish per week ?
Frances and I manage to fill one bin bag a week, maximum. Admittedly, there are only two of us. If we assume the existence of a Mr Price, then this is a seven-person household. Maybe two or three of the children are still in nappies, and wear disposables (can anyone such as
I could believe that one wheelie bin of unrecyclable rubbish might be overly restrictive for a family of seven, over the course of two weeks. Having never had a wheelie bin, I'm rather vague as to their capacity. I gather Reading has a scheme for allowing larger families an extra bin, which seems perfectly sensible.
But really... twenty bin bags ? Am I being unreasonable in assuming that the family must live entirely off packaged foods, and not even do the simplest things, like squashing the packaging ?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 08:04 pm (UTC)Of course, having five children (assuming they weren't quintuplets, about which she couldn't really have done a great deal) doesn't exactly single her out as a paragon of social responsibility either...
*oh the joy of Victorian terrace housing!
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 08:16 pm (UTC)My neighbours with two small children do not seem to use their recycling tubs, and routinely are observed sneaking out after I have put my bin out to fill it full of their excess rubbish. Their own wheelie bin is usually overflowing, and they have this less-than-charming habit of leaving any excess bags after that on the kerbside (the bin men will not take these).
I have never spoken to them, as I reckon its likely to be a tirade about recycling, how much crap they generate and the cheek of helping themselves to any free space in any nearby bin they can find.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 08:18 pm (UTC)However, it's dead unusual for kids to be in nappies beyond three years and the size varies with age (so to speak).
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 08:23 pm (UTC)Peasants like that make me want to go on a kill crazy rampage.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 08:49 pm (UTC)Wheelie bins hold about 3 bin bags worth roughly. Prior to moving I think that I managed to chuck out a few wheelie bins worth of accumulated rubbish out over the course of 5 or 6 weeks. That was a concerted effort to chuck out all my crap.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 08:52 pm (UTC)We generate 1-2 bags a week. The recycling is a little restrictive in its scope so we could potentially reduce this. And not using disposable nappies helps.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 09:21 pm (UTC)Also interesting to see they've gone for a hard cap rather than taxing landfill rubbish.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 10:43 pm (UTC)I gave up after the third recycling box got nicked...
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 10:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 10:49 pm (UTC)Either that or pension-age really will be 85 by the time we get there.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 10:55 pm (UTC)I also like the idea that even people with money are made to think, instead of being able to pay the problem to be ignored.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 11:02 pm (UTC)Quite aside from which the sorts of people who're having large families also tend to be the sorts who don't see why they should go to the trouble of separating out the recyclable parts of their rubbish.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 11:04 pm (UTC)Well yes, dear, but most of them aren't our kind of people, are they ?
<removes tongue from cheek>
no subject
Date: 2006-03-07 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 12:08 am (UTC)I've had the same one for the past 3 (I think) years. It had the house number written on the label, in biro. And then, a couple of weeks ago, the recycling people took it away. And left me a different one, with no label.
Actually, they left me two. It was quite hard to get rid of the second one...
no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 12:57 am (UTC)Simultaneously everybody exploded with various comments along the line of "learn to peel some bleedin' potatoes then!.."
no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 07:34 am (UTC)I suspect the choice is a political one: people don't understand taxes at all and they generate disproportionate anger and resistance.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 09:23 am (UTC)As it is, apathy and forgetfulness already causes problems for me with regards to fortnightly bin collection: I produce less than a bag a week, and never used to remember to put my wheely bin out each week, so now it's sometimes sitting there for four weeks! No problem with the volume, but it must be getting a bit skanky by then.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 09:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 09:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 10:43 am (UTC)Well yes - if she'd said that she couldn't cope with the restriction because she simply didn't have time to sort rubbish as well as care for five sprogs, I'd have been rather more sympathetic.
But she didn't say that.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 10:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 11:41 am (UTC)The crates we have tend to vary from time to time. Some of the binmen take a basket to their lorry, empty it and take it back; others - and this seems far more sensible to me - save themselves some effort by taking the basket just emptied to the _next_ house and leaving it to replace the full one.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 01:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 05:25 pm (UTC)Part is based on the impression that they make no effort to recycle anything (which strikes me as stunningly selfish, and makes me rather annoyed given the amount that can be recycled with minimal effort by just putting glass and scrap paper in the collection cartons the council provide for each house).
Part is that this is not an occassional 'opps I forgot to put it out last week' - this happens every week without fail. It would be a basic courtesy to ask their neighbours if they could use the spare space, but this is beyond them. Instead they prefer to dump it when they think no-one is watching (a number of us have observed what can only be described as rather guilty behaviour as they check to see whether anyone is apparently about before dumping their extra rubbish).
Part is also that our local council has suggested they might introduce an additional charge for excessive rubbish producers, and a council tax discount for under-users to encourage recycling. As someone who would qualify for a discount I don't particularly want them wrecking that - although how the wretched thing would actually work in practice is anyone's guess.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-08 09:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-12 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-12 01:54 pm (UTC)On the other hand, if you're going to put your rubbish out either in black binbags or in carrier bags, I can't think of a compelling reason it has to be binbags - other than that they're bigger and hence you get a better plastic:rubbish ratio.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-12 01:58 pm (UTC)Not really. If it were compulsory, lathany would still have to do it, the difference being that Mandy Price would to.
Unless you mean that if it were compulsory you'd do half of it for your house. In which case lathany is actually doing it so that you don't have to...
no subject
Date: 2006-03-12 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-12 02:50 pm (UTC)If lathany stopped recycling, Mandy Price would almost certainly not consequently have to start. So lathany isn't "doing it so that Mandy Price doesn't have to". If your local authority is close to quota and determined to meet it, I'll allow that lathany is doing it so that (in the short term, until the quota rises again) the businesses in your area don't have to.
If some people do none then everyone else does more.
Even ignoring the practicalities I describe, I'm not sure that's quite right, since people generally either do recycle or don't. With doorstep recycling, once you're filtering rubbish at all, it's isn't much extra effort to recycle whatever the council will take. So it's more like "if some people do none then everyone else is more likely to do some".
no subject
Date: 2006-03-12 03:00 pm (UTC)Yes, indeed - I imagine it's a binary thing for any given household.
You may be right about the corporate side of things, but that's really a separate issue. Similarly if landfill actually isn't a problem then the entire business of domestic recycling and debate surrounding it is mostly pointless.
"Suppose domestic recycling is necessary..." is - for me - the premise of the debate. If this turns out not to be the case, I'm quite happy for Mandy to do as she pleases.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-13 09:15 pm (UTC)Depends on the question :)
I was answering how to use up spare carrier bags you already had, not suggesting a sustainable strategy to avoid finding alternative bagging solutions in the future.
Bins and councils GRRR
Date: 2006-03-18 12:39 am (UTC)My house does recyle EVERYTHING that can be reclcyed, even better, items like egg boxes and carrier bags go to places where they will be reused instead of recylcled.
The stupidity however of any local authority that does not take away rubbish left for the bin men is breathtaking, I vented my splien at a college today, who laughed and said the concil had done the same with him, so he put his rubbish in the back of his car and dumped it in a layby..... I do not condone this but I can uderstand how he came to this state of mind.
People shold be encourged to recyle but failing to pick up rubbish left ot on bin days, leads to far worse.